HN user
Agreed. Generic names are difficult to find help on, especially in the software world. Like that modelling tool which was mentioned a while back - "Hash". Imagine googling for "Hash syntax error".
What's next, an ITIL-enabled accounting system called 'IT'?
Yes. In my experience, it usually comes down to "Our Windows admins don't know Linux, so it'll be easier for them to manage a server if it's running Windows!"
Except they never do, because they don't know PHP on Windows either and are afraid of breaking things, and the customer ends up with a PHP/Wordpress installation that is 4 years out of date. Luckily, most of those are internal-only apps, but it still sucks.
I am currently writing a hobby project in Rust with Rocket and Diesel. I could bang out a working prototype very quickly with either Python or something like ASP.NET, but I picked Rust because I want to get better at it.
Many of the things you say are true - Rust libraries in general need some love and polish before they can be beginner-friendly, but some are getting there. The difference between Diesel and Rocket, for example, is quite stark. The former has only the barest minimum 'examples' and 'guide', if they may be called that, and I feel like I'm expected to read and understand its source code to become really proficient with it. It takes a lot of experimenting and trial+error to do anything beyond the basics. Rocket, on the other hand, has a very comprehensive guide with useful examples and, so far, has been enjoyable to work.
That said, there are still a lot of "convenience" features missing. My current notable example is forms. As I'm doing it (I haven't looked into any addons to Rocket for this), I have to write out the HTML for the form myself, along with any Javascript I might require for validation, etc, then write the server-side methods for GET/POST, making sure to maintain the state myself. In this regard, something like Django's effortless ease to get a form on screen and store its data into a database really showcases where Rust (Rocket) still has a long way to go.
Hopefully, with more people using it, the tools and libraries will improve and mature, particularly the documentation.
When all is said and done, I enjoy "slogging" through Rust a lot more than I did working with Django, even with the slower progress. Something about this language really speaks to me.
Not to mention, it being Electron could[1] mean a memory hog. Granted, not all Electron apps are, but after seeing a GUI git client which ate up 800MiB+, I'm very skeptical about this technology. I don't want a shell, a chat client, a git client and an editor to take up 3-4GiB of my RAM...
[1] I can't claim that without testing, but it's a good possibility when it comes to Electron.
If I want my systems to fail in DNS resolution if the DHCP server doesn't give them a DNS server address (by design), I'm essentially SoL then? My option then is to block outgoing TCP/UDP 53 on my firewall, except from my forwarders. Or maybe I should just suck it up and start building systemd in-house an give it a bogus default, with all the maintenance and overhead that involves?
So, in a few months to a few years, when systemd silently switches to DNS over HTTPS, what then? Maintain a (growing) blacklist of public DoH servers?
I'd much prefer my software to fail (and let me know), rather than assume some default someone, somewhere, somewhen thought a good idea.