As mentioned by maintainers in the thread there is already a flag to catch unsigned overflows
Too bad such a flag doesn't exist.
HN user
As mentioned by maintainers in the thread there is already a flag to catch unsigned overflows
Too bad such a flag doesn't exist.
You seem to be unaware of Ludum dare and similar challenges where (literally) thousands of games are created over the weekend that could easily compete with games made in the 80's.
Skill is still here, it is just muted by the modern media. Back then a any game release was huge news, today such games are made all the time every day and don't even get noticed.
Nice example.
More people should know that the second if statement is unreachable code.
As mentioned by maintainers in the thread there is already a flag to catch unsigned overflows. They even mentioned a way to catch those overflows in the code.
I can't seem to find that flag. Only ftrapv for signed, but none for unsigned. Do you know what flag is it exactly?
Correlation without causation?
What if people that don't keep the phone in their pants life a different lifestyle that is different enough to cause the observed discrepancy.
That place should be relaxing and should feel like home, because it is. Keeping different levels of authority separated in different houses would be mandatory. Additionally workers living in the same house shouldn't be working on the same project[0] , even if that sounds counter-intuitive. The reason is that it diminishes possible conflicts, because in the case of unsolved argument, there is nowhere you can go, and humans can't always solve them.
[0]: but should certainly work in the same field.
Slightly off topic, but it really isn't hard to find partitions. Just run the various software to scan and that's it. I've done it at least twice when accidentally erasing a windows partition (once with fdisk when I misread the output, and at that time I didn't even know what a partition is).
Yes I agree. I can't be a coincidence. They deliberately picked the best weapon in this debate, biased public opinion.
Do you think they choose to ask Apple to do this in such a public way, because they are very confident the phone will contain information that will help with the investigation, which will make a positive precedent about this method for future requests, and also provide 'lobbying power' when new laws will be considered?
Don't touch the Rolex.
How sad it is that the can of coke is used as a comparison. It almost makes it look like a reasonable drink.
The World Health Organization has recently suggested cutting the recommended sugar intake for adults in half, to about 25 grams, around 6 teaspoons, of sugar for a normal weight adult a day.
Here is my favorite site that shows the amounts of sugar cubes in various unhealthy food: http://www.sugarstacks.com/
According to that information you can drink a half can of coke (most left one in the picture in the link) to satisfy that daily need. That implies that all other food you eat that day will not include any sugar! That is an impossible standard to reach. Solution, don't drink drinks with sugar.
If facebook doesn't want to delete his account, why don't you unfriend him?
For the former it really depends on your position. If on foot and on a monotonous route, then maybe if you can handle thinking in 5 minute bursts, anything else, not a chance.
You'd be surprised how much of a workload just sorting and text recognition is.
Uh, thanks for pointing that out. I'm familiar with allocated memory and effective type, but I never considered it from this perspective.
This could be quite a nasty surprise when the only change in the code is storage duration.
I was also under the impression that the One True Way to type pun was to cast to char, which is allowed to alias, and then cast again to the type you actually want.*
That clearly doesn't work, but I can see from a naive perspective why some think that. It feels like a nice hack, but a cast to char* doesn't "remove" the original type.
To be clear: char* can alias any type, but only char* can alias char*.
The problem they are addressing is already solved. Simply say at time X Y, where X is the time and Y is the offset, preferably an established offset.
We meet at 12:00 GMT
Done
Everyone only needs to remember one number, their local offset to GMT. If someone uses an, to the receiver, unknown offset, then look it up and do some first grade math.
Assuming no accretion disks, there wouldn't be any em radiation as far as I know. Where would it come from?
It felt nice when you had to physically meet a person to exchange the latest meme. The physical vicinity adds so much quality to the social experience. I cannot talk to friends the same way over char or even the phone than in person, it just feels weird.
I don't think they are insane. It is safe if you follow some rules. Flag -Wformat=2 catches every mistake at compile time. (It wont guard against overflow of course, but this is C)
The last example is explicitly defined in the Standard.
Isn't a modern strlen optimized into vector operations if possible anyway?
That's nothing, you should see the sad sad state of strings in assembly... Oh you're supposed to manage them yourself? Huh, what a concept.
Seriously though, a C programmer should know the downsides of C strings, and act accordingly, i.e. use a library if necessary.
The space is expanding and its expansion rate is accelerating. Dark energy is not pushing objects apart, it is causing the acceleration of expansion of space.
What you said isn't even pop science, it is blatantly wrong.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metric_expansion_of_space
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_energy
And the money quote:
It is called "dark" because it is not interacting with normal matter, but only with the space time structure.
The galaxy isn't traveling faster than c away from us, but space is being created in between. So, nothing is actually accelerating, there is no problem, Einstein is still right.
In fact, space is being created everywhere, including yourself and the computer screen. However the amount is so small that you don't notice and local forces nullify the change anyway. With large distances, this amount accumulates, and overwhelms the force of gravity and starts to create the apparent acceleration of distant galaxies away from us. Further explanation from paulddraper: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11068125
Methods of both parties will evolve, but ultimately as long as the user has control over his computer(no hardware DRM), he can display whatever he wants.
Here goes another one:
echo 127.0.0.1 www.wired.com >> hostsWatching the video is tech:
John Carmack(from the video): This is in now way replacement for highly sophisticated apps... ...you should clearly be using Unity or Unreal, you should be using a real game engine. If you have to do a lot of interaction with Java or native code, you should be writing a native application.
I tried to compile it, and I also couldn't find any other flag, than -Wconversion, that would detect this:
for(i = 0; i < length; i++) sum += a[i] * b[i];
^
I managed to hide the error if return values, which are double, are replaced with float_t. I believe in that case the bug stays in, but -Wconversion doesn't detect it.Of course the warning can always be silenced by doing something like:
for(i = 0; i < length; i++) sum += ( double )( a[i] * b[i] );
and adding a misleading comment about the explicit cast.I wonder how many of them would be caught using a very strict compiler flag regime.
For the winner, perhaps the gcc flag, -Wmissing-prototypes would catch it?
Can you provide the source? I would also like to check.