HN user

aokyler

45 karma
Posts0
Comments17
View on HN
No posts found.

I don't know what it's called specifically in context of other open Windows, but I'm guessing the functionality could be described as a feature of "IntelliSense" (but I think IntelliSense is Microsoft's name for it).

Where I work we merge with the no fast forward option - this keeps an accurate git feature topology where merges are represented as their own commit. We've found it gives us the best of best worlds: adding clarity/readability to the history while avoiding problematic rebases.

I haven't personally really noticed any downsides with that approach, can anyone else think of any?

I agree that javascript will be replaced in time, but that article in no way asserts that javascript is declining in favor of WebAssembly. WebAssembly shows promise, but it nowhere even near ready to begin mass adoption.

I have no issue with javascript fading away over time, that's just not what's happening right now.

Does this not basically say that javascript is still being used but people are opting to use transpiled siblings?

As far as I'm concerned we will still be adhering to all the core language constructs for the most adopted interpreter until a viable ancestor arrives.

"Xiaoice is not a polite listener. She answers questions like a 17-year-old girl. When a person pours out his or her heart to her, she is not always predictable. She can become impatient or even lose her temper. This lack of predictability is another key feature of a human-like conversation."

Predictability is a huge part of conversing. I expect a lot of range and flexibility in conversations, but definitely not unpredictability. It seems like an ai (chatbot, rather) behaving unpredictably just covers for it's lack of abilities and tact.

Nonetheless, this is still a very cool project.

I believe they determined their methodology on past similar studies (at least they compared their results, so I would hope they used the same methodology for determining a degree). The degree of separation just asserts that there exists a friend 1 who is somehow connected to another person (and on average some distance from any other person). It makes no claim on the quality of those connections.

Also, the assumption that because two people have interacted means those relationship are easier to leverage isn't substantiated. I'm sure the result would be interesting, but it wouldn't necessarily be "more correct".

This write up is really great. Hardware evaluations and comparisons like this are incredibly helpful as I learn more about benchmarking and choosing hardware.

Would there be long term implications for the chip's longevity in the unit because it runs so hot?