An issue that has arise for me in some situations is that for more expensive/reporting queries we point to a db replica, where temporary tables are not an option.
HN user
andsbf
meet.hn/city/-28.0023731,153.4145987/Gold-Coast-City
Socials: - github.com/Andsbf
---
Oh, so it isn’t about know to solve any leetcode?
Good to hear it
Reading the comments here I feel like… I have found my people. I love toying with the esphome and homeassistant.
... they would build at startup by processing their whole history of events (that was ridiculously slow for some of them)
There is a basic technique to solve this, you snapshot every "nth" event
Once you get married you get used to it :p
+1 for this, code should be layout to express business logic, abstractions that difficult the readability of the business logic are not worth it, it is a distractions. Yeah takes a while for juniors to understand when/how to use DRY.
Repetition is not a terrible evil, it has its place
As a Brazilian who migrated to another country, I mostly try to hide my background. It is great to see that some of our values, like compassion, are appreciated in other countries, and folks like Luiz André could show a bit of it
I have a reolink E1 hooked to my Homeassistant, the rstp stream seems to crash from time to time. I had never heard of neolink, would it help on this case?
`...If you call model.update(params) in Ruby, then it returns false if it fails and updates model.errors with what went wrong. Mutable state.`
This is Rails stuff, not Ruby
I give up on job interviews as soon as I receive a ".docx" with instructions, and I'm taking about "tech" companies
It seems to be a directional technology, so I'm not sure it would be applicable to RC submarines
Cats took over the internet a few years ago, now they are going after the phones
Geeks gonna geek it
When will people settle on the fact that there is no silver bullet? It's always a matter of trade offs according to the system needs.
I'm pretty on the same page as you.
I still to see something that is not "slammed" here on HN.
I read this article the other day that people with "technical background"[1] have this "instinct" to quickly look for "wrongs/fails" to avoid failures, issue here is, we express our selves terribly and most of the time it will go blunt on comments. This lead a whole discussion on the topic, some people it was the right thing to do, and others thought that we should be more human/kind to each others.
The article above was actually about Pull-Request/Code-reviews, and how some people will mostly scrutinise others people work to feel like a hero.
[1] I believe most of us here have a "technical background", who else uses a "ugly forum"
Good ape
Thanks, that was my point but I didn't have the energy to write it as well as you did. Appreciate it
Maybe Typescript?
Here:
'...some people in the twitter comments talking about this as a security issue...'
But it is Tesla, so people has to make a drama about it
Take a look at useReducer(no 3rd package, part of the React api)
Indeed great reading
- Other peeps careless code
- Stubborn juniors
I would say that the "Brazil cost" referred by the economists most probably means bribe.
Interesting, as English is my second language I always thought that the clunk behaviour was due to my accent. But reading this thread seems like it is not, google assistant is clunk