andrepew

Are there jurisdictions that allow this? In my jurisdiction, that would be considered a constructive dismissal and legally treated the same way as a layoff with the same employer obligations.

I've tried the vanilla Earpods which are pretty much the wired version of that. Those ones at least stay in my ear, but my ear starts to hurt after 30 mins or so.

This is who I used. Went to a local audiologist for the ear impression and mailed them over.

https://eartune.com/products/eartune-fidelity-a-pro

Edit: Note that these DO NOT fit inside the Airpods case, you'll need to remove them each time.

I'm the same and fixed the issue by getting some custom eartips made. They aren't cheap but have made my AirPods Pro usable.

On-ear headphones hurt my earlobes and over-ear headphones make my head get hot so I can't seem to find happiness anywhere. The custom eartips I think have gotten me the closest though!

Unless you’re dependent on one of the many many AWS services that don’t support IPv6-only access.

https://docs.aws.amazon.com/vpc/latest/userguide/aws-ipv6-su...

I imagine it was a fat fingering. I’ve purchased MBPs for my org in person at an Apple Store because I needed them urgently and I had to call my Apple rep to manually assign the serials to our company in ABM.

GDPR can apply extraterritorially but not to the extent you're suggesting.

For example, I am an EU citizen living in Canada. GDPR does not apply to any company interacting with me. However, for a US citizen living in an EU country GDPR would apply to every company they interact with. Even US based companies.

I think intent is probably implied. All software has bugs so with your assumption all software is malware.

I don’t think that clause would be enforceable because of the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act.

They can’t deny warranty coverage because of a user modification unless they can prove the modification caused the damage?

Money. Certifying a system like that would cost a fortune and unless the operator is forced to do it or you give them a very compelling case that helps their profitability, it ain’t happening

As a commercial pilot student, I misidentified a runway once but caught it in the air and early before I started final approach.

Easy to do if you’re unfamiliar with the airport and task saturated.

Although this is in small little piston plane with only one pilot. No idea what the situation is for airline pilots in multi-crew environments.

I wouldn't say saying it came from the inside is unique to AI art. You very much need a welder's understanding of welding in order to be able to automate it for example.

I'd just say the scale is different. Old school automation just required one expert to guide the development of an automation. AI art requires the expertise of thousands.

I think this depends on how much friction side-loading ends up being. If I can just click a link and hit "run" like I can on a computer, yeah it could be an issue.

If it requires diving in to Settings or connecting the phone to a computer -- Facebook would never abandon the App Store, friction to using side-loading would be too high.

I think FTX acted fraudulently rather than breaking a securities or banking law. They told users they were 1:1 and didn’t gamble with user deposits but did it anyway.

The app store is a separate business than hardware. They don't have to delete already installed apps, but continuing to distribute them I imagine the US government definitely does have the power to stop.

Depends on scale of B2B. Between enterprises, not as much. Between small businesses, works very well (at least in my experience, we are tiny B2B).

This is a huge one -- value in outsourcing blame. If you're down because of a major provider outage in the news, you're viewed more as a victim of a natural disaster rather than someone to be blamed.

Also, the strange thing is it is off in both directions. I had a family member order a Model X with a 5 month delivery timeline. He was super surprised to get the call to arrange delivery 3 weeks later.

People who have video calls throughout the day constantly. I don't want to have to mess around setting up my phone on a stand and getting it connected every time I need to do a meeting.

Would the person operating the equipment initially own the image?

I say initially because they've likely signed some agreement with their employer that assigns copyright created through the course of employment to the employer...

The employer may have then signed an agreement in purchasing that equipment that assigns some rights over the image to the equipment manufacturer...

So I guess who knows? In the absence of a law explicitly giving the patient rights to their data, it is probably a super complicated, case-by-case answer.

As much money as possible over what timeline? Crank profits now at the expense of the long-term business? Lose profits now to improve long-term business?

It isn't a straight-forward call to make. The current status-quo with resellers might be making money now, but there will be long-term brand damage in exchange. Will their business still be viable in 5 years if they develop a reputation for being Aliexpress lite?

And this is a textbook example of why you create a shareholder agreement when you start a company with other people.

Much easier to come up with equitable terms when nobody has done any work and the company isn’t worth anything yet.

Whoever is responsible/culpable doesn't matter. Sanctions aren't about punishing the population, they're about inciting a change.

A happy population doesn't riot and revolt. You need a miserable population to get something like that to happen.

"That unpredictability makes it stressful to drive because being ready to take over instantly means trying to predict what it will do."

I feel this. I rarely if ever use autopilot because I find the cognitive load and stress of monitoring it to be higher than just driving the car myself. The exception to this is when the road is absolutely empty.

I'm banking on a bike theft being a crime of opportunity and not necessarily being done by someone who has thought things through completely.

But against a professional thief an AirTag probably won't do much.

What tracker is comparable in price? An AirTag is $30 with no other monthly costs.

Genuinely asking, I would love to find a better solution.

Not hard for a non-technical person to remove the speaker. Housing pops right open with a small flathead screwdriver. Then you just remove the speaker's magnet, no desoldering or anything like that required. Took 5 minutes.

I did it to one of mine to use it to track my bicycle if it ever gets stolen.

I don't think the OP disagrees with you.

The patients who don't get the experimental treatment didn't refuse the experimental treatment -- they were never offered it at all which is the problem.

The ethics and regulatory red tape kills any hope for such a treatment before patient consent is even a question.

Hopefully we see more studies to corroborate this. I saw this go by the news a little while ago

https://globalnews.ca/news/8505406/cannabidiol-covid-19-stud...

Apologies for not linking the study directly, but not entirely sure if I have access to it.

If a person is identified as susceptible to this, do we need to revisit the current standards in medical ethics?

If telling someone of their diagnosis is a substantial risk to their health, should they be told? Should doctors always communicate a poor prognosis?