HN user

allears

1,467 karma
Posts0
Comments1,400
View on HN
No posts found.

The concept of "honesty" implies a conscious agent who is making some kind of moral decision. This is anthropomorphizing plain and simple. What would constitute a "dishonest" mistake? Deliberate deception? An LLM would have to be specifically prompted in some convoluted way to do that.

Post-scarcity? Sure, if you live in a first-world country and are upper middle class or higher. These tech-bro pundits have a very limited world view. The basic essentials of life are very scarce for millions and millions of people, and AI will probably make that worse, not better.

A browser isn't just a bunch of code that runs on your local machine. Security, maintainability, etc. depend on a development organization behind it, and these needs will only increase as the usage scales. You really need an ecosystem, not just an app.

And speaking of ecosystems, will your browser use plug-ins? Will it be compatible with other plug-in standards? If not, that's a whole different hill to climb, convincing the wider community to develop for your platform.

In other words, it takes a whole lot more than coding to launch an app, especially an app as complex and as central a part of a user's life as a browser.

This is a good post about the importance of being focused on your customers and your market when you are trying to decide if a product is viable. However, even though it may be realistically possible to build a product in a matter of weeks, and even though that product may be what the market needs, and you have a good way to distribute it, your startup is making good progress, etc., that method of building will leave you with a lot of technical debt. What happens when you need to add features, customize, etc.? Will you ask AI to do it all? What if there isn't any human who really understands your codebase? What suits a startup may not be good for the long haul. But then, you've already cashed out, so what do you care?

Threats to leave California are a bit toothless. The state has an enormous economy, something like 5th largest in the world if you were to consider California as a separate country. Few companies can afford to forego that market, which is why California has so much influence in setting standards. And any company that leaves, even the biggest, will have a minor effect on the state's finances.

I think you're underselling modern vacuums. Sure, a cordless stick doesn't work very well, but there's a lot of excellent canister and upright vacs made by names like Miele and Shark that have plenty of suction. Certainly not as much as your 750 watt monster, but I got the same sensation of using a new vacuum and seeing it pull up tons of dirt I didn't know was there with our latest Shark upright.

Using AI is great if you have already developed critical thinking skills. When you're just learning how to think, how to reason, how to have common sense, it's gonna get in the way.

Calculators are great, but it's still important to learn arithmetic.

I've heard of this before, including a first person account, and the effects are apparently that specific. Lots of people consistently report the same thing. It's not just moving patterns, it's actually a bunch of tiny people running around, climbing on the furniture, etc.

It doesn't really matter whether or not LLMs are conscious. They provide a convincing enough imitation that people are falling all over themselves to ruin our economy, decimate our workforce, etc. for their sake.

The philosophical angle is interesting, but the practical effects have changed, and will continue to change, everything.