HN user
I'll ask the obvious question: why?
Closures are the natural result of allowing the dynamic creation of lambdas, which is pretty central to JS as a language. A language "like Javascript but without closures" would no longer be "like Javascript".
Everyone here is well aware that TIME's editors choose the person of the year, and that the poll is a mere sideshow which at most might influence the editors' choice, right?
Cf. moot and /b/'s votespamming.
If you're a single, early 20s engineer in silicon valley, it's nigh on trivial to sock away ~40 k$ in a year.
That's easily a year's runway for yourself, or half a year with a cofounder.
in the way that a native speaker does
You are aware that native speakers can have (sometimes wildly) varying accents, right?
There are inarguably millions upon millions L1 English speakers in India. The fact that the English they speak isn't identical to the one you speak doesn't really change that fact.
Ironically, this post's explanation caused me understand the pumping lemma for the first time after years of letting my eyes just slide over any time I read across a mention.
(It nerdsniped me by claiming it was difficult.)