HN user
"Yes you are citing my link... "
Wasn't sure you actually read the information in that link.
"which is pure speculation."
Is it?
"Do you have anything to actually add?"
Given your temperament, no.
Again, I don't know the details so I cant say who is in the right
You are unsure of the details, so you instinctively choose to align with the $3T corporation. Further you assert the responsible discloser is "unhinged" for having a reaction to sustained abusive behavior by that $3T corporation.
Who exactly is unhinged here: the person who had a human reaction to abuse, or the person who thinks they are social in-group status with Microsoft? My vote is on the latter.
OpenAI apparently launched "Silent Memory Preflight", which functions as an internal self-audit of "hidden user memories" including an undisclosed knowledge memories layer[1].
[1] https://aiweekly.co/alerts/openai-deploys-silent-memory-pre-...
Wait no further. It's already happening.
One reason why a "logs are all you need" solution may fail: untrusted-log-as-injection[1].
Check those SBOM, and don't forget to include their CICD pipelines[2].
[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48315440
[2] https://github.com/jqwik-team/jqwik/issues/708#issuecomment-...
Because you don't agree doesn't make the legitimate callout (i.e., victim-blaming “what were you wearing” vs. calling someone “unhinged” after they've endured repeated abuse/stress) a logical fallacy. Rather it positions you in opposition.
Everything you disagree with isn't incorrect.
“False analogy” isn’t a counterpoint, it's a deflection. What part of the mapping breaks for you?
ahh, the "what was she wearing" comment.
Any malware or LLM with user-level filesystem access can attack the outdated KDF [1] and/or wait for Firefox to be running with an unlocked credential store and read the decrypted passwords from Firefox's process memory.
Neural plasticity definitely matters.
Incorrect. Adding LLMs in the browser IS the backdoor into your computer.