HN user
Below: the share of runs that went poking around the web for it. Filthy cheaters!
I can understand that in their benchmark setting they wouldn't want the model to find an existing solution. But in my day to day work, wouldn't I want the model to search online for the best solution? Am I not shooting myself in the foot by preventing it?
Ironically it gives me: This IP address has performed an unusually high number of requests and has been temporarily rate limited.
That's also something what AI did to the internet :(
I definitely cannot do that. Crazy.
I am really curious for what reason they choose to do it? Like what is in for Nasdaq?
They claim that they store user data on different servers in different jurisdictions so it becomes more difficult for authorities to gain access [1]. Maybe that's true and it has something to do with these DCs that seem to be unused.
I'd chose Cambridge every time. But that's because I think I'd enjoy the time on the campus much more than in the corporate hell of Amazon. YMMV.
Escaped after 16 years with peak burn out 92%.
In reality I am 11 years in, nowhere near escape and maybe at 80% burnout.
My experience with ink jet was, that the printheads clog up because I use it too rarely. So I like the idea, but it probably has the same problem.
I really like what Spain is doing recently. If it weren't for climate change, I'd consider moving there.
Every single model is (and always was) behind anything from China.
My guess is, that Mistral plays fair and doesn't try to extract data from US models, while Chinese companies are not.
The thing is, that many people still sit with the issues caused by covid and you can estimate from the sample how many people were affected if you had delayed the vaccine.
I think it's super helpful. Sure it doesn't help with ticks, you don't find, but in my experience it starts to itch eventually even with the tick attached. If it's negative good, if it's positive go see a doctor.
I don't fully understand it. Are they liable for content made up by their AI? Or are they now liable for content written by others and summed up (correctly) by their AI?
If it is not allowed to be used in the EU, it shouldn't be allowed to export it.
Although these chemicals are not allowed on the EU market, they can still be exported from European Member States to third countries. From there, they can return to Europe as residues in imported food — a “toxic pesticides boomerang” that puts consumers at risk.
To back up your third point, here is a study of the political bias in the German public service broadcasters (in German):
https://web.archive.org/web/20240207032743/https://polkom.if...
It would be, if you had any control over what the algorithm feeds you. But you don't, so what does really change?
I mean, if Spotify would provide a nice way to download their music (which they also pirated back in the days when they had no money but an idea) annas archive would not need to use scraping.
Thanks, Big Tech!
Would this replace something like codebase-memory-mcp[1] or improve when both is being used?
Well, Nate Glubish seems to be the Minister of Technology and Innovation of Alberta.
For me it's different. I am not diagnosed, but I think my executive function doesn't work right. It's really hard for me to start a new task, but when it is interesting enough I can hyper focus until it's done. In the past that often happened when I needed to implement something not too trivial. But now that AI does the implementation in minutes I need to switch tasks constantly and it is honestly super exhausting for me.
TIL
The article assumes single digit million as cost. That is a drop in the water when it comes to cost of running ISS.
Additionally the technical paper claims psychological benefits for humans to have something familiar in a harsh and unfamiliar environment. Which will also come in handy for when humans travel beyond LEO.
I haven't tried it, but conceptually I can imagine that it is good to have a separate VCS for the agent. This way I can keep git clean and easy to understand for humans and still keep all the verbosity the agent needs.
What are these practical ways to solve it? And who do you think will implement them? Especially when Billionaires control the opinions of a big chunk of the population.
I would assume that it was some cost optimization that led to the removal of the pressure relief.
How are they supposed to fine sites out of their jurisdiction?
How does this prevent a second market for one time codes? I as an adult can just get a code and sell it someone else.
Is it still advisable to use something like codebase-memory-mcp for large codebases, or is Dirac doing fine without that?
Right? And who clicks the popups? I have no clue about the economics of online ads, but my understanding is, it is cents per click. This would mean hundreds of thousands visits per year? Sounds like there are bots involved to me.