HN user
Also a steady stream of people that unknowingly have subscriptions. If you have older parents or grand parents, show them the subscriptions screen in the app store from time to time.
(USA specific) Depending on the state, "totaled" might still mean YOU can't fix and drive your car again.
In Illinois, you can only retain a totaled vehicle if it was hail damage or it's a "vintage (9+ yr old) car.
At the end of the day, when something looks like a duck, walks like a duck, quacks like a duck; it doesn't matter how much the nitty-gritty details prove the thing is absolutely not "actually" a duck to the average person.
The "smarts" of a smart tv is just spyware(adware) by a different name that actively subsidizes and reduces the cost of low-end TVs.
What worked for me was convincing myself, deep deep down, that I don't want any alcohol to drink. It's just poison, addictive poison, that's provably bad for you with like no real upsides that aren't just shaky arguments propped up by billions upon billions (upon billions) of dollars in marketing spend. It's a shit, over priced drug. If you really want/need a recreational drug in your life, there are better options, it's a stupid sad shame that alcohol has taken hold as the main social drug, it belongs under the sink with the rest of the household cleaners.
So how do you quit drinking if you want to? Figure out why you still seem to want to drink at all. If you're going literal weeks at a time without drinking, that's great, you're probably not fighting the chemical addiction part. Most people that give in to daily cravings are just very addicted to the chemical alchohol and are constantly feeding their addiction.
After some weeks, if you're still going back to alcohol, it's because you still see it in some good/positive light. That's understandable, remember, billions and billions of dollars are spent every year trying to convince you that alchohol is THE way to have fun, relax, meet new people, and live that amazing life that only seems to exist on billboards and in commercials.
Once you just see alcohol as a poison you don't want to drink, not drinking alchohol is as easy as not drinking bleach or windex. For two years now I've had exactly as much to drink as I wanted to (zero), it's quite freeing really.
Lol.
Drunk drivers are killers. People that text and drive are killers. People that get kicked by their kid and turn around for a second to yell at them are killers.
I'll take an unfatigable, indistractable, computer that literally has eyes in the back of its head, and on the side of its head, and the front, and can bounce radar under cars, etc over the pitiful example of a "safe (human) driver" we have now.
(I know you run out of people in real world teams pretty quickly but) rotating pairs regularly helps with this, with a maximum of two-week pairings to avoid this and other issues.
There are other benefits, pair programming reduces a whole category of simple bugs/typos to basically 0, keeps people on task, offers (literally) immediate feedback.
Unlike most programming "best practices" or paradigms, there's actual empirical evidence that pair programming is "better". Fewer bugs, easier to read code, shorter review cycles.
My guess as to why we don't see more adoption is 1) most developers aren't that fond of it, and 2) most managers do some quick gut check mental math and assume 2 programmers + 1 computer can't be equal to or greater than 2 programmers + 2 computers, that's nonsense, actual evidence be damned.
edit to add: I agree with commenters that pairing is more demanding/draining than solo work. I shudder at the thought of anyone trying to pair for 8hrs straight, or "all day every day 40hrs/wk". Nobody solo programs like that either though.
Do you drink a lot of coffee or other caffeinated drinks, especially later in the day? I used to think caffeine didn't have much affect on my sleep, until I cut it out. Old habits die hard, but I just drink decaf coffee now and am getting better sleep then I can remember.
I think you run a much bigger risk of a "West Coast" party in the FPTP system (looking at SNP in the UK).
In a proportional system, California and the west coast is not pure blue or liberal or some new "independence party". Without even looking at numbers I'm sure California alone has as many or more conservative leaning voters than Wyoming, Alaska, Montana, Idaho, and the Dakotas combined, we just never see it thanks to our antiquated setup.
Consultants with more budget than sense seems more likely.
I would set up each reporting unit (precint/causaus site) with their own sheet. There are probably only 5-10 officials per site that should even have edit access, maybe less, like only secretaries?
Make a nice formatted layout specific to that year. People feel pretty comfortable in excel-like spreadsheets/forms.
Then at the state level, since you have permission to all the sheets, its simple to aggregates all the sheet data
It's not some wiz-bang branded app with fancy animations, but its piggybacking on a very robust spreadsheet system that many people have some experience/intuition with.
Minus the google being evil part, this entire operation could have been done in google sheets and would probably have gone 100 x better. With free robust revision history, permission control, and everything....
It refers to public housing: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_housing
There's other ways of manipulating the numbers too. I attended App Academy, but as an "auditing student" meaning I paid the same price and did the same work but, according to the information, I might not get a pair to program with if the classroom count was odd.
However, I'd bet a shiny nickel that auditing students aren't part of their advertised statistics. Or at least auditing students that don't make the numbers better. I "graduated" just fine and found a job at above their salary avg, so who knows if I'm part of their numbers or not.
Edit to add: Not trying to say anything bad about AA here, I really enjoyed the program and it has been money well spent. I just wanted to chime in on the topic of "9X% of students make 6 figures after graduation"
This makes sense to me and rings true to my own experience. I went to a bootcamp and the people that did the best were those with a good deal of prior experience, and thus able to digest the most information. Students coming with zero (or close to it) programming experience/effort didn't perform well.
I'm including myself in the "good deal of prior experience" group, I did fine in the class and in my subsequent jobs. My class even had students that had been web devs on less desirable stacks using the class to ramp up on rails and they did even better.
Sure there is: https://www.reddit.com/r/zerocarb/
That said, eating only animal products makes keto look tame in comparison.
I'll echo other replies and agree that we should put different people in prison, not more. I'd argue that white collar crime hurts more people than consensual and most violent crimes and it should be punished as such.
I live mostly in the front end world, but if I was asked this (without looking it up) I'd say a DB builds a tree (balanced tree, binary tree maybe?) using the columns requested. This allows for very fast lookups when the table is queried for its indexed column(s), and blows away the worst case scenario of a non-indexed query time wise, where the DB has to do a full table scan to find out that a record doesn't exist. The trade-off is that the index must be rebuilt on inserts (probably deletes and maybe updates too?) and the resulting data structure stored, which is why you don't just index all the things.
Keto might not be for everyone, but unless you're a type 1 diabetic it's not nearly as dangerous as you're describing. It's just a low carb high fat.
Even assuming your conservative adoption/relevance curve of the technology itself, I don't think we need too many more incremental steps before society has to stand up and take notice of an unemployment problem that can't keep up. AI / automation might not turn our day to day lives into the Jetsons in 5 years, but if it gives us 25%+ real unemployment we're still going to be in for a ride.
Take any suggestions you see here with a grain of salt, but my ¢2. Being 'the top of the class' at a boot camp doesn't mean much, unless you have a chance of being hired on as an instructor (which can be very well paid). As a former bootcamper, the people that did the best in the job hunt were those with CS degrees (for the reasons you mentioned), those who hustled like hell to land a job, and then maybe those who did best in the course.
If you already have your LinkedIn, GitHub, personal site, and dynamic resume tailored to post locked in; I'd suggest trying to get take-home coding challenges from companies that you can give them back on github/bitbucket. Bring it up in cover letters / phone screens. It will help you ramp up on the skills employers want, and it shouldn't take too many before you get an offer.