HN user

TacticalMalice

71 karma
Posts0
Comments37
View on HN
No posts found.

"Government rules that tenants cannot be evicted during corona crisis"

The above is an agreement between several housing cooperations/companies and the ministry. It is not a law and eviction orders due to backpay have still been granted after June 2020, when access to the courts opened up again for these cases.

And yes, judges will consider the interests of all parties. In the case where a judge won't grant an eviction, the tenant will be ordered to pay missed rent.

Also tenants can sign contract with you ( as landlord) and immediately go to the Huur Commissie and argue their rent is too high. So it will be lowered if they first signed a different contract with the landlord.

This is only possible for social housing (based on the point system), so this shouldn't come as a surprise for the landlord. This is also a reason to avoid renting out social housing.

The only thing during COVID that's affecting most landlords is that rent increase is maximized. Considering that employees are supported via their employer's NOW-subsidy, I don't buy the argument for this maximization for people that still have jobs. Another benefit to offering only temporary contracts.

I know a landlord who waited 2 years.

Waited two years before getting an order, or only successfully getting an order after two years?

Eviction is already possible after 3 months of not paying rents (and sometimes after 2 months if there's a history of non-payment). The landlord has to get a court order, which is commonly granted.

Minors will be placed in foster care if they cannot be placed elsewhere.

Taxes on earnings depend on how you structure your work. They are usually in "box 3" where taxes are based on fictitious returns on investment as a percentage of total wealth and (fictitious) asset class.

That said, law-makers are a significant source of uncertainty and risk.

Those shells are temporary; They talk about endospore forming bacteria. They are very hardy and "dormant", but can reactivate given the right conditions. Bacillus cereus for example can survive rice cooking in the spore form, then reactivate and poison you if you leave the cooked rice out of the fridge long enough.

The mentioned issue has the following statement which makes me wonder whether concurrent use on sync services is supported atm:

I was going to add tests for "concurrent" access of the same file in phase 2 of these changes. Phase 2 is refactoring the saving process entirely to make it asynchronous and robust to file sync services.