Staross

I thought it was very interesting, but maybe also incredibly naive politically ? it's like he's re-discovering alienation under capitalism.

A wood-worker could do the same argument, there's the "official" wood-working word of perfect joinery and beautifully finished tables one can buy, but behind it there's the "secret" messy human element, the art, the craft, the mistakes and hard-ships, the elevation of human skills and imagination, the creation of whole new types of wood-working inventions and techniques, the perpetuation of millenia-old traditions, the teaching, the joy of selling to a happy customer, etc.

But now comes techo-capitalism, division of labor, you cut that piece a that piece over and over, you operate that machine, you won't even see the finished table, fuck your human element, we want that profit !

It's already on my bank app since a couple of week, but I haven't tried it yet.

You should really do a Bayesian fit for such predictions and give confidence intervals, it would probably show that the uncertainty is very high in these cases.

That works well to get around patents btw :)

If it taste as good and is cheaper, sure.

I think there's quite a bit of "quiet work" going on that isn't very visible. Personally I've been happily using Julia for work everyday for years. When the language was younger there was "big" updates that were news worthy, now that slowed down, but it seems there's a decent number of people using the language for serious work that is just a bit too specialised for general interest. E.g. in recent registered packages there's a simulation of earth, a method to analyse EEG recording, or a method to measure loudness.

https://github.com/NumericalEarth/NumericalEarth.jl

https://github.com/Marco-Congedo/Xloreta.jl

https://github.com/slink/ZwickerLoudness.jl

I gave it a try, I asked to do a reddit like forum and it did pretty good but damn I quickly hit the daily limit of the $20 pro account, and it took 10% of the monthly just to do the setup and some basics. I knew LLM were expensive to run but I've never felt it directly. Even if the code is good it's kinda expensive for what you get.

Ho it was also quite funny it used the exact same color as hackernews and a similar layout.

Also tried it on a small project, it did ok finding issues but completely failed doing rather basic edits, like it lost closing brackets or used wrong syntax and couldn't recover. The CLI was easy to setup and use though.

Yeah that was a missed opportunity fore sure, joining forces 8 years ago would probably had yield better results that the current situation.

Funny how the already weak case for not working on Julia instead of creating a new language is becoming even more flimsy :

FAQ:

Why not make Julia better? We think Julia is a great language and it has a wonderful community, but Mojo is completely different. While Julia and Mojo might share some goals and look similar as an easy-to-use and high-performance alternative to Python, we’re taking a completely different approach to building Mojo. Notably, Mojo is Python-first and doesn't require existing Python developers to learn a new syntax.

https://docs.modular.com/mojo/faq/#why-not-make-julia-better

Now :

We oversold Mojo as a Python superset too early and realized that we should focus on what Mojo can do for people TODAY, not what it will grow into. As such, we currently explain Mojo as a language that's great for making stuff go fast on CPUs and GPUs.

And it's basically not possible to escape that environment until the plane lands

Ever heard of closing your eyes ?

I would add:

- Good integrated test system (and test culture in the community)

- Super good package/environment manager

- Great integrated documentation system

- Good version control practices in the community

- Awesome community