Slyfox33

you can block is with Ublock Origin

https://www.reddit.com/r/uBlockOrigin/comments/1ct5mpt/heres...

"Just don't make mistakes!"

I really don't understand people's obsession with this fact. Every game that was developed on consoles before the playstation was also written in its machines assembly language. It was extremely normal at that time.

Yea they can't edit assembly because they have reliable tools that work 100% of the time, always. They don't have to manually inspect the output of the assembler every time they write any code. This is not even close to the same thing as LLMs.

"Dave" by itself is basically the same as in c++, just a pointer to a string literal. Dave.to_string() is like std::string {"Dave"}, it allocates a heap based string from said literal. So you can use "Dave" perfectly fine if you just want a string literal.

No, it would be impossible to make C memory safe without just making a new language.

You voted for the rapist felon buddy. Please go ahead and explain your definition of fascism.

Think that was sarcasm.

The Geometry Transform Engine is a separate chip. It's a Cpu co-processor, all it does is some basic linear algebra. The Cpu uses it to perform that math faster and then it writes it back to ram where it ships the data off to the actual Gpu, which is something completely separate. (I've written a PSX emulator).

Chat gpt will not always return the correct answers, thats a fundamental limitation of how it works since its non deterministic. So just saying "it worked for me" means nothing.

What...? You guys will take any possible chance you can to whine and cry about minorities having a job wont you?

Were they aware of that at the time though? If I'm remembering right they cut him out right after the allegations emerged.

This game only makes sense as "online only" since its pvp. Do you just want it not to exist?

"When" doing a lot of heavy lifting here.

What are you talking about? Yes it's impossible to have UB in safe rust unless theres some obscure compiler bug or something. This isn't a controversial statement.

They are absolutely cheaper. You can get a pretty decent 48 inch TV for ~$200.

Normally when you search you can look at many different results. With "AI Search" you just have to trust the magic box, which you already know is wrong a lot of the time.

Shocker.

Why would anyone want to purposely read AI bot content?

No?

Weren't they just getting better mostly because they were being scaled up? There's no way to do that once you've exhausted all of the data. Besides progress has slowed down at this point anyway.

I tried asking it to compare 9.11 to 9.9 using a python sandbox and it wrote the python code and then told me the result of the code would be 9.11 > 9.9 without actually running it. lol.

I did read the article.

Oh give me a break. Renewable energy advocates are "authoritarian" now? Lmao. What will you guys come up with next.

I just asked chatgpt: "comparing 9.9 and 9.11, which is larger?"

and it responded:

9.11 is larger than 9.9.

When comparing these two numbers:

    9.9 can be written as 9.90 to have the same number of decimal places.
    9.11 remains 9.11.

    The integer part (9) is the same for both.
    The first decimal place (9 vs. 1): 9 is larger.
    The second decimal place (0 vs. 1): 1 is larger, which makes 9.11 larger overall.

Sorry buddy, evolution is a fact.

It doesn't indicate anything. There's no proof or evidence yet. It's just OpenAI spokespeople hyping themselves up.

What you call "bloat" is how other languages handle complexity that C necessitates that the programmer handle. Enjoy.

What's the context of the quote? What positions?

No, they shouldn't be allowed to fuck over their customers at ever turn so they can be greedy. The suggestion that we should be more worried about how much money the AT&T execs and shareholders make over their needs of their 100 million customers is bizarre.