RohMin

Do you think the average person would need this sort of clarification? How many of us would have recommended to walk?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LvW1HTSLPEk

I thought this was a solid take

I guess with ~50 years of CPU advancements, 3-4 seconds for a TUI to open makes it seem like we lost the plot somewhere along the way.

I wish Odin could gain more traction

First time I've heard someone say a thinkpad is bulky

I really want to learn his methodology to writing software

Who knows? It just needs to be better than the average engineer.

I do feel with the rise of "reasoning" class of models, it's not hard to believe that code quality will improve over time.

This is a policy enforced by OpenAI, not OpenRouter

git switch focuses on switching branches while git checkout extends further than that

That's actually a really interesting way to leverage that feature. Have you found this easier than other services built specifically for this use case?

I guess there's something about Python that just makes it really easy to read and write for me. I haven't found another language that fits the vibe. From my experience, the resentment towards stronger typing comes from developers misusing it.

this comment section smells like Reddit - ugh

Those "actual" working products had little use until infrastructure was built around it to make it useful. The same could definitely be happening to LLMs, we'll just have to wait and see. It is just way too early to claim that they're a mimic of a product.

It's unfair to dismiss and simplify this technology when it only just started reaching critical mass ~2 years ago. Looking at history, transformative technologies rarely show immediate productivity gains. The internet took nearly a decade from the early 1990s before we saw clear economic impact. Electricity needed 30 years (1890s-1920s) to significantly transform industrial productivity, as factories had to completely redesign their operations. Personal computers were around since the late 1970s, but their productivity impact wasn't measurable until the late 1980s/early 1990s. Major technological shifts require time for society to develop optimal use cases, build supporting infrastructure, and adapt workflows

I'd rather view this simply as programmers interact with computers differently than users.

This is actually a great perspective to have. The idea that there is no fundamental law of physics that should prevent us from replicating or exceeding the functionality of the human brain through artificial means makes this a question of when, not if.

Easy to say when you're likely not there experiencing the conflict first hand...give ME a break

I guess you're not necessarily improving your social skills playing alone?

I haven't been able to get a great answer regarding why OpenAI is consistently leading the pack. What could they possibly be doing different? I can't imagine they've invented a technique that nobody else can reach at this point

While most of the body’s serotonin is indeed in the gut, the serotonin that impacts our mood, sleep, and other cognitive functions is exclusively produced and used in the brain.

The reason I ask is because I feel that a memory model is one of the major bottlenecks toward AGI.

With the introduction of plugins, is it feasible to give ChatGPT some kind of long term and short term memory model?

Forgive me if I’m just being naive but couldn’t you look at the source from the browser dev tools?

I feel that the original post rubbed me the wrong way. The whole "others have it worse, so toughen up" doesn't serve to help anyone.

Empathy for those laid off shouldn't vary based on visa status. These are real people losing their jobs, searching for another job in an already saturated market.

It must be miserable to use technology with such paranoia.

How are we to survive then

This thread is a perfect example as to why Apple will never please everyone.