HN user

Roboprog

2,235 karma
Posts0
Comments2,097
View on HN
No posts found.
Roland 50 Studio 4 years ago

If you have an iOS device, KQ Dixie is a pretty good DX7 emulation. It’s an audio unit, so you can load it into a host (“DAW”) and add an effects chain, even though it’s on a mobile device

Apple M1 Ultra 4 years ago

I suspect they will have a different naming convention after they get to M4.

There might be some hesitance installing an M5. You should stay out of the way if the machine learning core needs more power.

I guess by the time they get to M5, anyone old enough to get the reference will have retired.

I like iOS, but I won’t buy their flagship hardware. It’s too expensive for something so fragile.

I have 3 iOS devices, but I won’t pay a grand for a phone. I would rather replace my base level devices in 4 or 5 years when they start to age out.

I picked up on that angle as well.

“Ignition” isn’t about generating electricity. It’s about making fusion bombs which don’t emit neutrons or other radiation (from a fission trigger) while the device is in storage.

So, not primarily a power generation design like a tokamak would be.

Ah, yes, the IBM PC. I think of it as the Permian extinction (Great Dying) of computer science.

I’m joking, but... most higher level languages were tossed aside for “serious” app development. First to use x86 assembly, then “portable assembly” (C). Much of the “worse is better” methodology can be attributed to giving many people computers, but initially very underpowered computers.

I don’t think you can run something like Native Instruments acoustic instrument sample suite on Linux.

I’m guessing they want orchestra sounds, and not just analog/subtractive, FM or other digital synth sounds.

Bingo!

It was apparently off limits to discuss how the family of one presidential candidate made so much money overseas for doing so little, and might this have something to do with how a member of that family perceives policy?

If the [redacted] government offers $10 million in “forgivable” loans to a family, might they be expecting to recoup that “investment” in some way?

Nope, nothing to see here, move along citizens. Ignorance is strength.

Yeah, the list of plaintiffs definitely has an axe to grind.

And hey, how about those voting machines, while we’re at it? A solution in search of a problem.

Thanks for pointing that out.

Safe to assume views go in the “code” schema with procs/funcs/packages, leaving just tables and sequences (if needed) in the “data” schema?

Considering building a side project using this kind of approach...

Presumably you can revert to a previous tag/label in source control and reload the previous procs/funcs to roll back versions.

The apps I have been working on are monoliths which run at about 2% CPU on the server, so there is no A/B comparison runs in production (e.g. on January 1, some law goes into effect and you WILL implement it). I would happily see ORM usage curb stomped.

I think the order management system at Pizza Hut in the early 90s was on SCO.

(Yeah, Snow Crash hit a little too close to home for me.)

We had an SCO box (among other unices) at the job I worked in the early 90s making software to port RPG code off of IBM minis.

That seems to be pretty common statement about JavaScript, but strangely not one I share.

I have been programming since the early 80s, and my experience with JS has been pretty positive, especially compared to the slog through the unreadable mud that is enterprise Java. (If I was going to rage quit on something, it would be the verbose, obtuse, repetitive Java sludge I’ve had to read the last decade and a half)

Typescript solves problems I don’t have. The Jetbrains IDEs do autocomplete just fine on vanilla JS, and the documentation window automatically shows the initialization and any JSDoc for most every symbol the editor cursor touches. I avoid writing code with thousands of global symbols.

OOP languages like Object Pascal and C++ are good for making lemonade from the lemon of manual memory management, but if you have efficient garbage collection, use functional programming techniques rather than OOP bloat, and many self inflicted problems go away.

I hope TS doesn’t turn JS into Enterprise Java, The Next Generation.

Nothing personal, most people seem to prefer that style. Just understand, there is a reason some people run away from the C++ / Java / C# / TS milieu.

I think the parent post was attributing longFuglyCapsUnpronouncabeName type identifiers to the Java language/culture, As much as (just) the editor?

I’m biased, though. I HATE gigantic supposedly “self documenting” (but utterly impossible to actually say aloud) identifiers.

My ideal identifiers are 2, maybe 3, syllables, with dashes or underscores, with actual documentation of WHY anything visible beyond The scope of a single function is used.

It seems to crash or otherwise reload frequently as well, at least in Safari on my iPad.

After a while I put it in reader mode, until it reloaded crapify mode again :-(

Note to Wired staff: surely you can do something that would make people want to return to your site, rather than viewing it as a last resort?