Rattled

Olmo by AllenAI and Pythia by EleutherAI.

I find it more useful to anchor the concept of "real" in what one has direct access to. Beyond that there are many ways to describe our shared reality and the space of possible realities, including the past and future, some of which are more real than others, and go far beyond what we can imagine. Quantum physics gives us a language to expand what we can describe and imagine.

Some of the most intrusive cookie banners I've seen are on EU institutional websites. If they can't find a way to provide access to information without pages of consent boxes what hope have the rest of us. The law came ten years too late and focused on a narrow technical step rather than the privacy goals directly.

No sarcasm intended, from the details of both incidents they seem unrelated and not meant to send a message. Whatever the motives it seems unlikely anyone could arrange a storm to target the yacht.

It's not mentioned in this article but it seems Michael Lynch's codefendant in the HP trial Stephen Chamberlain died a few days earlier - https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/article/2024/sep/05/mike.... Seems to be a genuine coincidence though.

When was this? I would have thought the internet was well established before fiber optic cabling was widely used.

Well said, too many people conflate AI and crypto, and dismiss both without understanding either. Crypto has demonstrated very limited benefit compared to its cost, exchanging value has been a solved problem for millenia. We're only beginning to understand what can be done with LLMs but we can see some limits. Although it causes some harm to say it doesn't create any value is ridiculous. We can't yet see if the benefits outweigh the cost but it looks to me like they will.

Why is it so hard to accept that different people can have a different internal experience of our shared reality? Perhaps different people have conscious awareness of different aspects of their own cognition pipelines though the pipeline is similar for most people, or perhaps there is a more fundamental diversity in how different people think. I find it interesting though how strong an aversion some have to being told what's going on in their own heads.

Can the title in the HN post be changed? I agree it's totally misleading after reading the article.

It is, until you get to all the Musk and Tate posts under the thread.

This is the third formulation I've come across that sounds like this with space and time emerging from particle interactions. The other two are from Stephen Wolfram and Carlo Rovelli. Are the formulations related do you know?

I've struggled to get beyond their popular science descriptions to the actual theories, I find descriptions like the amplituhedron being 'a multidimensional jewel' distracting, if you have any suggestions where to start for a deeper understanding of this one I'd be interested.

Yes, PoW crypto is now a much more concrete example of the potential damage from poorly aligned utility functions, as well as the challenges in containing a system once it is released.

I'm finding the current hype cycle very frustrating from both sides. On one side there is frequent overplaying current capabilities, and cherry picked examples given as it they're representative. On the other side there is an over simplistic "AI is evil" reaction. It's hard to deny that progress in the past few years greatly exceeds expectations and could make a significant improvement to individual creativity and learning, as well as how we cooperate but so much of the discussions are fear based.

I think some audio books are slightly slowed down by default, many I've listened to sound more natural at about 1.2x

I was told of Algebra coming from Al-Jabr meaning "number games". I was surprised I didn't see this mentioned in the article, until I found the book mentioned in Al-Khwarizmi's biography [1]. The book's title is "Hisab al-jabr w'al-muqabala" but no translation is given and Google's translation "Al Jaber account and interview" is not helpful. Can anyone confirm or deny the explanation I was given?

[1] http://www-history.mcs.st-andrews.ac.uk/Mathematicians/Al-Kh...

Oracle has just open sourced the entire JDK.

Last time I had to download a JDK I got a warning about having to pay a license for commercial use. I think most enterprises care more about the licensing arrangement than access to the source.

More like Wexford English (Yola), which was a remnant of old English.

Threading in email clients has been around for decades. Actually I must check if there are mobile versions of mutt or elm.

I didn't have the concept of the eschaton until today, looks like an interesting rabbit hole to explore.

I don't know how old your kids are, but if they're younger than 3 it gets easier. Never is extreme, you will surely have time for side projects at some point, but if you really care about it make it a goal to be part of your working day. That could be by expanding the scope of your current role, or cutting your working week to work for yourself a few days a month.

A cell has no way to conceive of a worm, and worms probably can't conceive of humans. But they probably have some conception of birds, and birds can perceive humans. Where are our birds? As you go up the intelligence chain the ability to see beyond seems to increase, but we don't see anything beyond us.

It is ironic, but there are still a couple of member states that rely on English. I think it's unlikely to be deprecated. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impact_of_Brexit_on_the_Euro...

Are many US based businesses considering limiting access to EU consumers to avoid GDPR? Reselling user data seems to be part of many business models, and I don't know if EU is such a huge market internationally, especially without UK. I support the goal of improving data privacy, and in general GDPR is seen positively by those I've talked to, but the EUs last attempt resulted in useless, intrusive cookie warnings all over the place.

Reminds me of working in a telecoms manufacturer in 2000 before the .com crash. There were times before end of quarter when unfinished devices were put in trucks and sent for a drive around town, to return after inspections were finished.

I switched to using this style in the last few years, but it only works well where the code is reasonably good quality otherwise, in particular with short methods and classes. If you're dealing with legacy code with massive procedural style methods having return statements scattered around makes things even more confusing.

I hope it is just a traffic surge, not a great cannon.

I'd say Starbucks business model is coffee distribution, their product is coffee, unless I have to pay an entrance fee for Starbucks. It's a good example, and the article flawed as it might be does highlight the concerns of content creators. Platforms tend to drive down the share of revenue passed on to providers and reduce their bargaining power, this is not specific to Spotify but an unfortunate reality.