Pinn2

I have a huge ego and like more money. Is HackerOne the best way to feed both?

The .gitignore is a good way to see if a project cares about being precise.

Except for you, right? People like to feel better about themselves by declaring defects in everyone else but themselves. Even me.

Liking the Go, not liking the .gitignore.

Spark any use? I just saw free and assumed some ptw scheme.

As usual, I checked the .gitignore. You may want to try "/gowiki" instead of "gowiki".

Limited still means having a choice in what to bet. Trivial EV calculations can only tell you to bet or not, so I assume it's using something more involved.

I texted to a word game displayed on a Times Square banner. Got monthly "support emails" featuring garbage trivia, and a $10 charge hidden on my at&T bill. I think it was one of those shortened phone numbers, though.

Quite the opposite of "lacking"--way too much.

Well, that's a knock on /github then. The entries should be as minimal as possible, in number and in individual length.

I find the .gitignore a good way to gauge the quality of a repo. This one does not exhibit quality.

.gitignore ignores "foo" and "bar". Should I trust the rest of the project? Is this a convention?

Neat! Just remember that it's not just who you know--it's what you know! You'll go far.

Neat! Would a 1-bit computer be 8 times easier?

Are there any ads? It is unusual for a game to be on the App Store without monetization.

I have more trust in Apple Pay and hope that wins.

At some point we'll have unified memory and storage anyway. Our brains are already unified in our perception of memory, so I have no problem telling people the storage amount as "memory".

The problem with Markov chains is that they are named after a person, which makes math seem more like a "private club". For instance, why use "abelian group", when "commutative group" will do? The reasons for wanting to be a member of an exclusive group are psychological.