HN user

PerfectDlite

48 karma
Posts0
Comments165
View on HN
No posts found.

Tu-144 flew before Concord.

"The aircraft was introduced into passenger service on 1 November 1977, almost two years after Concorde, because of budget restrictions."

Yes, they've managed to "overcame bourgeous West" with Tu-144, but because design and production was rushed - they got Paris air show crash, postponed operational services and generally bad design, forcing earlier retirement for Tu-144.

excerpts from the magazine "Trud" from 13 June 1941

Those excerpts miraculously appeared only in 2013, when another wave of Russian nationalism sweeped over.

Consider me suspicious.

Soviet scientists did a lot contributions to the scientific community, including in such areas like chemistry, cybernetics, neurophysiology, psychology among others, just like any other big country in the world.

No. Other big countries made _actual_ inventions (US, UK, France, Germany).

Are there any?

Yes. A lot.

Making iPhone copies will probably be prohibitively expensive, otherwise China will already make those in numbers.

According to iPhone 7 teardown [0] there's 3x difference in components price and retail price - $220 vs $649.

Do you think that everyone in the China and the world missed the opportunity to eat into that kind of margin?

[0] https://9to5mac.com/2016/09/20/649-iphone-7-estimated-to-cos...

F-117 stealth technology is based on research done in USSR

That's like saying that all Soviet technology is based on research done in UK and France. You know: Newton, Lavoisier, Pascal, Boyle, Joule...

happily took a ride in the first MiG-29s delivered to us in the 1980s and "stole" technology from there

Take a ride == stole technology?

Are you serious?

a lot of excellent engineers and scientist that worked on technology in USSR.

Name me THREE scientific achievements "made in USSR" which ordinary people still use in their daily lives.

No, AK machine gun will not do. And sputnik is no go as well - nobody listens to radio beeps nowadays.

Can you? Just three of them? Surely, 70 years of scientific achievements will do wonders, right?

Ю it disproves the myth (used to justify the atom bombs) that only being nuked forced them to consider surrender.

How is this a myth if nukes were mentioned in emperor's address as a reason to surrender?

The US response was to carpet bomb Japanese cities full of civilians, carpet bomb foreign cities held by Japan holding civilians and citizens of foreign nations, etc... then to top it off, they felt fully justified to drop two nuclear bombs on two cities full of civilians in Japan to teach East-Asia a lesson.

Looks like your perception of history is... a little bit skewed.