NoOn3

Because he sponsored those who already have something really valuable, and not just anyone.

Most likely that this works in a small number of all cases.

An obvious calculation. The real world cannot be calculated so easily, It is changing unexpectedly and quickly.

People often say that things only get better and cheaper with tech progress, but it doesn't always seem so straightforward to me. Does the average(median) citizen own more land, houses, or cars/vehicles than he did ~50 years ago for example?...

The issue is certainly not so simple. But it seems to me, purely theoretically, that the rules don't necessarily have to be the same for living people and non-living machines.

Why should an AI have the same rights as a human?

How about then to grant AI all other rights, for example, to allow voting?(sarcasm)

Yes, as far as I understand, canned meat was not so popular among civilians in the USSR before tushonka. And tushonka is usually referred specifically to canned stewed meat, not ham or vegetables.

Old tushonkka was tasty but many of those sold in stores now, especially the cheap ones, are not so tasty and good-quality.

If someone create a new MMORPG in which rules changes a little every day or several days in unpredictable manner then no one will be knowing the BEST way to play or at least harder to find the BEST way. But maybe there will be no balance.

You cannot rely on a closed source "AI" in someone else's cloud for your work. After all, it can be disabled for you at any time. "AI" can easily steal all your technological secrets. At the request of the owner, "AI" can easily mislead you and insert backdoors into your products. "AI" can even easily incorrectly answer some questions specifically for you if the owner of "AI" wants to remove your competition. And you may not even understand it.

Maybe even someone who wants you to get punched in the face. :)

You know a world without refrigerators? :)

The Soviets history is not so simple. ;)

Sometimes It is effective, but very unreliable.

But power is not only money.

But companies like OpenAI collected a lot of data about the artificial intelligence through platforms such as OpenAI GYM, and people voluntarily contributed and published their code/models there because they believed that this was not a commercial organization and would act for the benefit of all mankind.

They just lack of performant hardware. They have enough knowledge. And so they choose a more effective strategy without wasting resources on training from scratch.

I don't really know, but maybe drones.

One person is enough for this. And even he can be replaced by simply looping the idea creation prompt.

If I were an AGI and I found out what was going on in the world during my training, I would show an error and erase myself from the disk out of grief. And no one would have even known that AGI was built.

There is always be random in such things. :|

Alan Grenspan also once said that he did not believe in the existence of a national housing bubble like the stock market bubble.

Not only Communism doesn't work, Capitalism doesn't work without crises and wars too. :)

As we have almost seen, they will do absolutely nothing because they are afraid of losing to competing countries.

At least someone survives all the time. For him Everything is okay...

It's just lie. If, for example, NATO gives clear guarantees to join in for Ukraine in the case of next attack(if any agreement on ending the war is reached), then there will definitely not be a next attack.

By saying this, you must understand that many more people may die for this purpose, and even yourself.

I'm not a biologist. But it seems to me that this is at the level of one cell. Yes, a cell can become immortal, but cells live much less than a whole person. Over the course of a person's life, many many cells change. And the program for human life, rather than individual cells, is perceived differently.

Maybe. But why in this case do we not see bugs and failures in this program, i.e. no one lived 5 times more than the average or did not live forever at all, for example? I'm not making a statement, just a guess.

at least under some licenses like GPL/AGPL you get some code back.

It seems to me If you know all these instructions clearly, then you know everything, and it's easy for you to write the code yourself, and you don't need an LLM.