MitziMoto

Grok's look like a truly disturbed child. Like the drawings from that kid in "The Ring".

As far as I can tell, these ads still look like ads, clearly marked as sponsored?

Something similar has been happening to me with Ghostty, but there is no error message or link and it only happens when Claude uses it's interactive questions interface.

It becomes completely unresponsive to any input except scrolling. I can't select options or even cancel out.

(I am in no way implying this is related to Bun)

Although the site is very fast for me as of this writing, it looks like they're running into an issue:

https://lobste.rs/s/ko1ji1/lobste_rs_is_now_running_on_sqlit...

I hope they get it sorted soon, I'm rooting for sqlite.

Their largest one, which is smaller than a standard piece of paper, starts at $200 and goes up to $270.

For a notebook. With what might be proprietary refills.

What.

Hey, don't forget: Google is also bad at search!

What a save! What a save! What a save! (Chat disabled for 3s)

I'm no longer in corporate America, so maybe I'm out of touch a bit, but could you just...not...use an LLM? You can still solve interesting problems on your own if you choose to do so?

Also building voice agents and have found GPT 5.4 with no thinking to be the sweet spot for latency vs intelligence vs cost.

GPT 5.5 with no reasoning is actually slightly faster, and much smarter, but too expensive.

What I'm really looking forward to are the next gen speech to speech models. gpt-realtime-2 is almost there, but not quite good enough for our use case. 5.4 actually beats it on answer latency even cascaded with stt/tts.

I'm trying not to be the "you're holding it wrong" guy, but ... have you just tried telling it to explore the codebase for things it might break?

Yeah, so was building moon rockets.

You static typed evangelists have lost your damn minds. You seem to have completely misunderstood what this library even is because you have some primal urge to boast static typing at every chance.

You can build high quality software with dynamically typed languages, and Ruby is an absolute dream to read and write.

We use and love RubyLLM! A wonderful and easy to use framework.

Agreed with another commenter on the frustration with the responses API not being naively supported; that seems like a huge miss. There is a connector from another dev, but it's buggy and not as high quality as the main gem.

Really looking forward to future development and especially 2.0!

Edit: Just saw that responses API is now native? I will definitely check that out.

I think something the article glazes over is that all these AI search results, whether it's Google AI Overviews, ChatGPT, or whatever, are mostly synthesizing and summarizing existing search results from classic search algorithms.

If the results the LLMs are grounded in haven't changed, then LLMs haven't changed SEO much.

...except, of course, stealing clicks from the actual creators.

Exactly. Not Starlink, but Tesla, their stupid non AI allocation tracker said my model X would be ready in a month for about 13 straight months (Early Model X plaid allocation)

I think you are wildly underestimating how much of a hard on people have for calling businesses, even when there are better and faster options clearly available, like clicking a button online.

Staffing our phone lines is the absolute bane of my small (non tech) business.

It's crazy to me that someone as distinguished as PG, as well as so many of the comments here on HN, completely missed this point.

So a Tesla Roadster? :)

Exactly! Many Ferraris of the past have gotten single digit MPG, no one cares. All of a sudden they have to make a Chinese looking EV because of "efficiency"? Give me a break.

Litestream exists?

Sama is the world's second most successful grifter. There's one guy ahead of him.

Because it has an emdash and people can't fathom that real people use emdashes. Like the LLMs didn't learn it from somewhere.

MCP isn't going anywhere. Some developers can't seem to see past their terminal or dev environment when it comes to MCP. Skills, etc do not replace MCP and MCP is far more than just documentation searching.

MCP is a great way for an LLM to connect to an external system in a standardized way and immediately understand what tools it has available, when and how to use them, what their inputs and outputs are,etc.

For example, we built a custom MCP server for our CRM. Now our voice and chat agents that run on elevenlabs infrastructure can connect to our system with one endpoint, understand what actions it can take, and what information it needs to collect from the user to perform those actions.

I guess this could maybe be done with webhooks or an API spec with a well crafted prompt? Or if eleven labs provided an executable environment with tool calling? But at some point you're just reinventing a lot of the functionality you get for free from MCP, and all major LLMs seem to know how to use MCP already.

PaperWM let's you define these types of per window rules in it's settings.

Same. Chrome on Manjaro with Wayland, just crashes.

My favorite setup so far is using the Claude code extension in VScode. All the power of CC, but it opens files and diffs in VScode. Easy to read and modify as needed.

For goodness sake, this is what makes it great!

This reminds me so much of the "old" internet where people would just make fun things for the hell of it.

To be fair, Google HAS shown "signs" of cracking down on this; but they haven't actually done it in any useful capacity yet.

They call it "Site reputation abuse". https://developers.google.com/search/docs/essentials/spam-po...

This seems like a misunderstanding of Chapman's quote. I don't think he implied a compromise on safety or reliability, just speed and handling.

I am curious, did this small business actually provide the service you were searching for or not? If they do, then it sounds like it was ultimately useful.