It will not help the discussion forward to behave like fans and treat any substantial critique as "you are one of those old fashioned mindless programming dudes".
On the other hand, in the light of Victor's achievements in industry (including "shipping" stuff) one cannot dismiss him as a smooth talking TEDdie either.
Victor has provided many crafted examples of what can be achieved in the fields of engineering, mathematics and programming, or any field of science and technology, if the feedback loop between the tool and its user is improved.
Indeed, this 30 minute talk does not compare to an industrial delivery. It has some theatre and some deliberate exaggerations or unfair treatment of society evolutions. Such is the nature of talks.
I do not think he sees the current state of affairs as a great mistake. He will surely acknowledge all practical circumstances and conceptual challenges that have made certain inferior designs survive while superior ones did not materialize.
The message is: we shouldn't accept this state of affairs as final or as one that can only be marginally improved. It can still be radically improved. The industry is still fresh - even ideas from the 60s are valid and underachieved.
I see his critique as a positive statement of hope and encouragement, not as a pointing finger to all you silly programmers.