HN user

Hyolobrika

7 karma
Posts0
Comments27
View on HN
No posts found.

IMO, GNS would benefit from a blockchain to store the root zone. Currently, It is managed by a non-profit. You can add your own TLD but good luck enabling everyone to resolve it without GNUnet e.V's say-so. The problem is making a blockchain that's private enough.

I would go further. I would say that people should be allowed to make up their own mind without unjust interference (i.e. censorship (such as shadow-banning) and artificial manipulation of visibility (such as putting 'fact-checks' in prominent positions)) regardless of whether someone in a position of authority (whether elected into government, bought into the board of directors or shareholders of some company, or just has mod privileges for whatever reason) thinks it's true or not. The people decide for themselves what's true, not the powerful.

Tether is on record as censoring transactions (remember the Poly Network fiasco?). They are clearly centrally controlled despite being a token on the Ethereum network.

Whether they should have censored transactions in that instance is irrelevant. The fact remains that the coin does not belong to it's holders.

Would you need to use computer vision or could you just decode the state of the DOM if on a chess website or monitor the telnet connection if on FICS?

Lisp from Nothing 6 years ago

What is "case significant" vs "case sensitive"? You seem to be speaking as though there is a difference but I can't find anything online.

Debubble 6 years ago

| Debubble will make sure you wait for your turn before you can deliver your arguments. What if you forget to say something when you first make the post? | It will also limit each response to 1500 characters (roughly one page) and the entire debate to 12 turns. This bit seems unnecessarily limiting to me.