HarfTarf

I just signed up on your site, looking for kubernetes and Linux work.

You could build an application on top of ipfs as an encrypted store, and use ssb to broadcast your messages to other nodes.

Here's a Google translation:

https://i.imgur.com/TWZLwVY.png

Yes, it bothered me. I only skimmed the article looking for how it got its name, but the article never answers the question. How frustrating...

My only feedback is "thanks!"

As an American that has gone through the process, I can confirm that there is a lot of irrelevant junk crammed down our throats and poured into our ears.

In that sense, I would agree, ipfs can provide access to content that would otherwise be blocked.

make no mistake: ipfs _by_itself_ is no more "anonymous" than torrenting or other types of file sharing ftp/sftp/ssh/http/whatever...

because they can always get your ip address.

You will need to use some other method if you want anonymity.

He's stuck inside

I too would pay for a "supporter badge".

https://ipfs.github.io/public-gateway-checker/

https://ipfs.github.io/public-gateway-checker/ It would be nice to add your gateway to the list.

I read it once, and was immediately duped.

You must hear lots of things that scream.

If you are trying to achieve encryption, then no, you will not need https, as cjdns is encrypted at every packet be nature. If you are trying to comply to some other https related standard, then you will need https.

Any physical link can support cjdns; ethernet, 2.4ghz, 5ghz.

I've never heard of netsukuku until now, but from a quick glance, they are very similar except that cjdns has a much higher usage in the wild and doesnt have an answer to dns.

This is ingenious, your public address is also your public key, and the payload of the packet can only be decrypted by your private key. So awesome, it has encryption built in.