GreedIsGood

Of course Amazon cares. They measure fulfillment time religiously.

Amazon is amazingly well run.

None of this addresses perhaps the main issue. Bell Labs predated the venture capital revolution of the 1970s.

The key insight of venture capital was that firms like Bell Labs were holding on to very valuable resources at compensation rates that were far below what those resources could generate if they were empowered to create their own firms.

This was tremendously successful. While we have no counterfactual, innovation in the US blosomed ove the last 50 years. The fundamental research may have languished (I would probably disagree, moore's law didn't happen through magic for example) a tremendous number of companies, and all of the large companies we know of today, which provide all of the services of the modern world were a result of venture capital.

Prosecutors have wide ranging discretion, our laws are complex and subject to a tremendous amount of interpretation.

Without protection the executive would be at the mercy of the judicial branch. This is clearly an inversion of power.

Perhaps the solution is clean out our legal system wholesale so that it is obvious to all involved whether an action or set of actions could not result in prosecution in the future. Such an action was not within the power of the supreme court.

BTW, great title.

There have been multiple awful titles of for this ruling, yours was exactly correct.

My guess is that Ilya is the one that saddled OpenAI with it's insane structure.

He's brilliant, no doubt, but he shouldn't be in leadership.

This is plausible, Elon is a fantastic recruiter and he recruited Ilya for OpenAI. There are reports of xAI buying enormous numbers of GPUs and Elon's level of control of his companies means that Ilya recklessness isn't an issue.

It's a match. Probably the best match possible.

He showed exceptionally bad judgement, judgement is perhaps the most important characteristic of high level employees.

He's brilliant, which means someone will take a leap of faith, but he badly, badly damaged his brand as a leader going forward.

Charlie has been at MSFT a little while now, I suspect he knows how the machine works.

I would expect this to result in lower feature velocity. In theory features are tied to increasing revenue. If so, I wonder if he is actually willing to make that trade off.

If the US wants to argue reciprocity then it should in a trade bill.

Requiring TikTok to sell is an overreach by the state. It will leads us on a path where companies will be strictly regional.

Not a fan.

Is this worse than humans?

(edit) I see that the article included that FSD is 5x safer than humans, which may be valid.

The article then said : "However, the only reason it is safer than the US average is that it is supervised by drivers who ideally pay extra attention when using FSD."

I am positive that they had zero data to back that assertion.