GarvielLoken

I think the datacenters will simple be repurposed for hardware as a service, specially cloud gaming, sense it will be to expensive to buy a new computer anyway.

This is actually what DOTS (Unity’s Data-Oriented Technology Stack) do in Unity, so very good to use a game engine as an example! It reportedly is just as enourmous of an performance gain as you show in the article.

https://unity.com/dots

There are no fees for University. See how fun it is when you assume how it is in your country is the same in all the other countries in the world?

"Moore said. The US Central Command has also tried to run an AI recommendation engine to see if it could suggest the best weapons to use in operations and create attack plans. The technology, however, "frequently fell short.""

Are they using LLM for this as well? Then of coruse it's going to be hard. I don't understand why many working with AI refuses to use an AI that's good for this. CSP solvers! There are some papers about using them for drone making flight paths.

I wasn't commenting on their performance in the war. But on the viability of the tank in modern warfare.

The Russians have all the history they need about tank losses. They suffered 76% tank losses during ww2, 83,500 tanks. You think they are stupid and don't know any better. But they have known all the facts sense ww2, it's just the nature of modern war (from ww2 where AFV were used) that you are going to suffer high losses, that doesn't mean that you don't try to attack.

They won't. Armchair generals think that massive losses of tanks would mean that they are going away. In real life it does not mean that. In ww2 Soviet lost 76% of all tanks they produces during the war, 83,500. And they still choose a tank focued strategic doctrine after this fact during the cold war, and they knew better than anyone else how many tank losses they suffered during ww2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equipment_losses_in_World_War_...

So this war, the Yom Kippur, the Syria war, they have no news regarding tank losses. Tanks were never designed to be invulnerable, and their losses have never meant that they don't work. The Soviet and the Russians knows this. The west think that tank's will survive battle fields, but from a historical point of view that is a delusion. Tanks are still the least bad choice, they are faster and hit harder than infantry, which if you think AFV have it though against drone corrected artillery, infantry is a sheit site worse.

"Hot Reload" Every day we step closer to ANSI Common Lisp 1994 golden standard. May this mainstream change hasten the renaissance of Image based software.

"anybody" = an office worker that has spent his life behind a desk. We are talking about farmers and craftsmen that has marched on foot for years with their gear. And now days we know that even our fastest runners train 80% of theri weekely training in a low steady state traingins, the kind of conditioning that increases the heart size, lowers the resting pulse and improves your ability to work after rest.

Thought this was gonna be about 4k TVs and anti aliasing.

Outward in my mind is the best modern rpg in Elder Scolls style, and with that I mean a great focus on the atmosphere of the world that you walk around in and immerse yourself in. I played Morrowind as a teen with 5.1 sound and absolutely loved it, strong memory of going through that long valley into the northern desert area, immersive game.

Now Outward is a third person game made by an indie team, but the game has matured a bit now and they have released three DLCs. You got some factions, have to chose your build, cook food and sleep in the wilderness. And it has great outdoors areas that you are just gonna fall in love with, and really great music to go with the exploration. And the nature and creatures in the game actually reminds you of Morrowind. A real gem.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nN8fSxg7cEs&ab_channel=Play4...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rD0vqPnbQPc&ab_channel=PlayS...

You don't have to "understand" it. Just form a basic opioun of what you think they will do and build an experience of what usually happens. That is what I do anyway as a software developer for 8 years.

What kind of guy devotes this much time to worrying about people who doesn't agree with him? Doesn't he have any hobby or passion in his life?

I ran a Phenom II x4 DDR2 until this summer when I bought a Ryzen 3700X. It could not play Battlefield, Rainbow Six Siege, Squad, Far Cry, Pubg ( could almost play, loading stream time was the killer), Mordhau and the likes, but it could play a lot of games, so many that I didn't need to upgrade, it was the computer as a whole that was giving up.

I could play Wargame Red Dragon, Dark Souls 3, Dota2, Dishonored 2, Remnant from the ashes, Warhammer 1 total war, Disco Elysium, Dragon Age Inquisition, Fallout 3 New Vegas.

Prepositions is an inheritable flawed concept in all languages, like on the train, on the station, in the square. It should ideally be replaced with some transport inflection and lacking that just ignored when it is used for common phrases and not actual space positional markings.

Salmon if you get it, here in the Nordic it is considered high class food, usually expensive.

Yeah, the Zelda series is alright. And the Zelda games for all consoles are still worth playing.

Totally agree. Dark Souls threw every third person action game of the nineties down the trash. Same with the wargame series being the best rts game ever released, in complexity combined with real time and unit balance it's unparalleled.

The only 90 games worth talking about anymore are the rpg games, the space simulators/rpgs and Homeworld. As in that you would actually prefer to play it instead of a modern game for none nostalgic reasons.

And we still have games breaking new ground like Disco Elysium.

Ever heard about artillery? Or even rocket artillery?

I think it did, if not otherwise because modern jets simply have stopped relying on their own radars, making long range IRST more important.

Only if you care personally for the kids. Pick up a history book, filled with famous persons who had lot's of kids, but they were raised by family and staff.

Hanlon's razor. "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity"

Where do these unhistoric French bashing memes come from? Is it taught in school in US and UK? I swear to god Anglosaxons thinks that the English won the 100-year war.

They would not form deep columns to punch through, only one nation used solid squares in that age and that was the Prussian army. The French would form battalion columns which are pairs of companys deployed individually in lines after each other. Most of the brittish vs column memes are from ambushes where naturally the ambushed part had not time to deploy to line.

http://www.napolun.com/mirror/napoleonistyka.atspace.com/inf... " The Prussians formed their battalions (4 companies each) rather in closed columns than hollow squares. Their regulations issued in 1812 (Exercir Reglement fur die Infanterie) eliminated the hollow square in favour of a dense column formed from the Angriffscolonne."

The french moved to contact in maneuver columns, Just Like Everybody Else Did As Well. The fact that you don't hear the brittish doing it is because they very seldom advanced at all in any battle. This is what we still do, we march manourver battalions in columns on roads and deploy mechanized forced out to a line once we are close to the enemy.

" - however, if the enemy kept his cool and opened fire only at close range, the officers instead of tightening the column, they deployed it into line and opened fire. As soon as the enemy began wavering under the fire they charged with bayonets. In 1805 at Austerlitz, French columns advanced with great coolness and at slow pace. The Russian infantry fired at long range but the French continued their march until they were 100 paces away from the enemy. They halted and opened fire, then "formed in several lines" and rapidly moved forward. The enemy fled. Captain Bonnet described similar infantry attack at Borodino; after few minutes the Russian skirmishers arrived in good order a little to the left "... and a dense column to our right. I deploy my battalion and, without firing, march straight at the column. It recoils. When carrying out this movement we were so exposed to grapeshot from the guns in the village that I saw my battalion falling and being breached like a crenellated wall. But still we went on.""

And by the way the nation which most frequently deployed "spread out" troops are, wait for it, the French!

"Several companies or even battalions could be employed as skirmishers (tirailleurs en grande bande). The tiralleurs en grande bande acted in large numbers, stormed or defended a position, or turned the flank of the enemy. The large skirmish formations were usually supported by columns and artillery. At Friedland General Oudinot had deployed 2 full battalions as skirmishers into the Sortlack Wood. In 1814 at La Rothiere four French battalions were formed in skirmish order by La Giberie to anticipate any attack which might develop in the rear of the wood. The French on occasion deployed even entire divisions [!] in skirmish formations. (Nafziger - "Imperial Bayonets" 1996 p 111) In 1806 at Jena, the French 16th Light Infantry advanced left in front towards the woods: its third battalion advanced en tirailleurs (in skirmish order) towards the wood, the first and second battalion, marching still in column, went past the right of the woods and deployed into line in the plain at musket range from the Prussian battery."

"The British well-drilled regulars were humiliated by American farmers, militia and Indians fighting in lose order. The american experience made a profound impact and resulted in tactical and organizational changes in the British army. But still the quality of the British skirmishers (except the 60th and 95th Regiment) was below their French counterparts. French General Foy wrote: "Several regiments of the line, such as the [British] 43rd, the 51st, the 52nd etc., are called light infantry regiments. These corps, as well as the light companies of the battalions, have nothing light about them but the name; for they are armed and with some slight change in the decorations, clothed like the rest of the infantry. It was considered that the English soldier did not possess sufficient intelligence and address to combine with the regular duty of the line the service of inspiration of the sharpshooter."

A Royal Scots officer wrote after Waterloo, that the French skirmishers were better trained, and on the whole much more effective in this type of fighting than the British skirmishers. (Barbero - "The Battle" p 255)

Moyle Sherer of the 34th Foot wrote on the British skirmishers: "Not a soul….was in the village, but a wood a few hundred yards to its left, and the ravines above it, were filled with French light infantry. I, with my company, was soon engaged in smart skirmishing among the ravines, and lost about 11 men, killed and wounded, out of thirty-eight. The English do not skirmish so well as the Germans or the French; and it is really hard work to make them preserve their proper extended order, cover themselves, and not throw away their fire; and in the performance of this duty, an officer is, I think, far more exposed that in line fighting." (Rory Muir- "Tactics and the Experience of Battle in the Age of Napoleon")"

What an ignorant article. The Soviet union was a peer to the "Western" and "Modern System" and they would totally use chemical weapon during a conflict, asymmetrical tactics and in general any underhand methods that they could think of. Typical Nato way = The only way article. And the Soviet union was more mechanized and earlier then the US. If anything Nato was the static tactic user during the cold war.

Source: https://fas.org/irp/doddir/army/fm100-2-1.pdf Page 186, section 16-3

It was an event in the Dune timeline where humans overthrew their machine overlords and vowed to never build machines in the lines of the human mind and never become dependent on machines or mechanical thinking again.

Until the Butlerian Jihad my friend

Sounds like a guy who would really hate Smalltalk :D

" if we find ourselves regularly having to outrun predators"

Lol, humans will only run from a predator one time. This is not Hollywood, you don't outrun jaguars, bears or wolf packs.

Well, isn't this exactly what the Author did? He worked blue-collar jobs for decades and "putting in the real work at the typewriter before each shift at the day job".

I think you are right about games. I play a lot of games, but I also have more physical hobbies than I have weekdays to practice them. Which means that all my gaming time is usually a couple of hours after training when I'm tired anyways or they are on weekend nights where I can be productive during the daytime if I choose.

And if for whatever reason don't train for a period and only game I get a little of what you are describing.