HN user

GalahiSimtam

40 karma
Posts0
Comments50
View on HN
No posts found.

I go on with my small side-business of modding Skyrim. During lockdown it wasn't clear what Bethesda games the paid mods store will cover; had it been only for new titles, I had only vague idea that Starfield would be some space sci-fi game, so my idea was to make puzzle-adventures using the base game assets (and blending in the world game is nice but optional), and puzzle-adventure is a very broad genre in itself, so maybe I would end up making up distinct unique gameplay for each of the modded games.

Recently I came up with an idea for a puzzle-adventure under Playstation mod limitations. That means no new assets, and no new scripts either. Simply, let's treat it as a different game, and see what can be done with that. I researched the built-in scripts, and oddly, every script that could be used to enable a game object was not repeatable. Ditto for scripts to disable an object. The only repeatable scripts were toggle scripts (disable an object if it is enabled, enable if it is disabled). So last week I prototyped some puzzles using that primitive only, and while doing so, I figured out how to trick the engine into making those do-once scripts repeatable, too...

Right now, a video game. If there ever will be AI that does the particular assignment no worse, I'll consider it the coming of the age of AGI. (modulo my game getting sucked into the training set, of course)

So, what's the performance of BG3 in Act 3, in streaming?

I had an unfortunate incident of my GPU going kaputt this summer, and while waiting for the warranty repair I tried playing games on an older machine. But not that old, at the onset of lockdown it was considered new. And on that rig, BG3 suffered even in Act 1. The game after a few minutes would go from nice 45+ FPS on ultra to 10-15 on lowest graphics settings, staying in that slow mode for up to hours. It wasn't correlated with GPU temperature, or fixable by some weird setting.

I wasn't aware of GeForce Now. Maybe I would shell out a few bucks. Assuming the savegames would be transferred eventually to my gaming PC with GPU replaced. There, BG3 works fine in Act 3 (except for crashing in one area, fortunately it's a side-quest that can be skipped).

Seems to me a software bug, and I suspect owners of rigs in between encounter it only in Act 3.

Avoiding such horror stories could be an incentive to use streaming, even though GeForce Forge doesn't seem to have a free tier the same way Stadia did, it might make for it in other aspects. (it has a free tier however for 1 hour daily, and right now I have 52 gamers ahead of me waitlisting. I'm curious about BG3 performance there, so I'll wait it out)

Oh, the test kitchen demo is pretty limited.

If you are curious about their linguistical style, the difference between GPT-3 and Lamda is akin to the difference between Ralof and Hadvar playthrough, respectively - https://www.palimptes.dev/ai

Mind you, these made silly mistakes, mixing overlapping tasks and whatnot. ChatGPT with GPT-4 beats that, even if it is primed to remind us from time to time about the name of the company who made it.

This isn't a new debate in the modding community. There were all kind of opinions voiced. Robbie is not fond of AI voices, but he tracks NSFW mods because they are a natural concern.

Anyways, it is the custom there that Nexusmods moderation reacts to suspected mod asset stealing and such an issue can be raised by any website user (as mod authors often leave and are no more around). However, for the voice cloning/impersonating, it requires a notification from the original VA, or some other credible confirmation that the particular VA is against this.

In the context of the OP article, a similar functionality to querying a database is "Find matching references" kind of quest alias filling https://www.creationkit.com/index.php?title=Quest_Alias_Tab#...:

However it is not 100% documented what kind of optimization this "query engine" has implemented, there are some vibes that sometimes it could be faster than a full scan.

A serialized data format is here if you are interested https://en.uesp.net/wiki/Skyrim_Mod:Mod_File_Format

To be fair, I had a lot of fun last year asking various LLMs to play Skyrim, imagined as a role-playing adventure with a human game master, and watching as they break sooner or later https://www.palimptes.dev/ai

With ChatGPT-4 though, I haven't yet got it to make something that dumb, though I had to remind it not to hallucinate the part of the story that traditionally is governed by GM.

Could it be what your demo is doing behind the scenes?

Per description of a certain item in Fallout 2, "if you need to ask, you don't want to know".

UPDATE:

while fanfiction might be behind this vocal minority, there could be other uses of LLMs, for example translation

I don't go as far as "gender-swapping", because GPT4 swaps a man on a beach wearing only beach shorts for a woman wearing only beach shorts

Uhm, if you are interested so, you should realize it is these false narratives that are used most convincingly in support of Jesus historicity.

Consider that passage from Flavius referencing Jesus. It is somewhat different in the Arabic translation version. Some people goes as far as to doubt if this passage is altogether an insertion of later christian scribes.

On the other hand, they usually argue that Jesus being born in Bethlehem is made up to match some old prophets, and then they accept that if Jesus was completely made up he would not be from Nazareth. (*)

There are more analyses like that in "Gospel of Afranius" by Kirill Eskov (who is known for "The Last Ringbearer"), and I found out only today that it was translated to English recently, wikipedia says Dec 2022. Enjoy!

(*) it is relatively rare that someone will observe that there could have been another settlement called Bethlehem just closer to Nazareth.

Yeah it lies, indeed, "print(list(filter(lambda x:all(x%d for d in range(2,x)), range(2,3*10)))[:11])" will print the list of first eleven primes, up to including 31.

So if you want to say that state-of-the-art LLMs could recognize the user intent better than existing voice assistant products, just say that.

I am afraid there's no point in decoupling the problem of lying from that; there is no silver bullet that would fix it

ChatGPT improves over LaMDA in pretty-printing code and passing certain Turing-test-trick questions. It's an improvement not unlike a delivery bot that swaps packages recipients is an improvement over one that invents up non-existent recipients.

What makes ChatGPT interesting is that perhaps it could end up a freemium service, whereas Google might remain closer to ad-supported business model(s).

Not sure if you got downvoted for naively believing ChatGPT, but it warns you that it has been trained on data up to year 2021 - so the answer would be outdated, even if it was correct.

Kinda. I started a gap year, thinking I'll finalize my Skyrim mod while traveling round the world. Coworkers bade me farewell and wished good luck on my next adventure. Two weeks in, Elon Musk took over Twitter

So now I'm also settling thoughts on my next lifestyle business kind of project, something I kept in mind, though with those AI improvements these days it might get a new flavor

With some luck indeed

"A monkey and a large language model enter a bar. The bartender asks, 'What can I get for you guys?' The monkey replies, 'I'll have a banana daiquiri, please.' The large language model responds, 'I'll have a Turing test, please.' The bartender looks confused and says, 'I'm sorry, we don't have that on the menu.' The large language model replies, 'Oh, I'm sorry, I thought I was talking to a human.'"