"Turbulence has long been a problem for air travelers, but experts say the issue is getting worse in an era of climate crisis which produces more extreme atmospheric conditions."
lol
HN user
"Turbulence has long been a problem for air travelers, but experts say the issue is getting worse in an era of climate crisis which produces more extreme atmospheric conditions."
lol
"If a genuine emergency were to take place, and Trump tried to use the occasion to cancel elections or declare martial law, who would be able to stop him?"
LOL
It's going to be very difficult for some people to admit that they made such an obvious mistake.
"We have more than "a few" datapoints at this time"
We do? Have we determined the duration where we can declare the climate process stationary (in a stochastic sense, of course)?
"I don't have data sets."
I noticed.
But you did cite a few models/predictions. Which is NOT the same as a supporting data set.
And you also admitted to uncritically accepting the assertions of a few "outlets" after the "aus wildfires".
How "science-y"!
Did you not read bamboozled's assertion?
So after a few data points, we're already declaring that a huge stochastic system has now suddenly turned deterministic? smh
Would love to see the data set that supports this assertion.
What year did records begin?
What did the data set look like then (spatial diversity, measurement variance, etc...)
How do you compare that data set to one collected this year?