HN user
@mathiasrw: "This is no surprise if you follow the wave of evidence for the electrical universe model .."
I disagree but can offer no opposing evidence, therefore I'm going to mod your post into oblivion :]
What does this mean for the long term evolution of galaxies, no need for dark matter?
"Underestimating the dangers of designing a protection system"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PlaMQBEg-9M
“In the course of the investigation, a new type of flight assistance system known as the Maneuvering Characteristics Augmentation System (MCAS) came to light. It was intended to bring the flight characteristics of the latest (and fourth) generation of Boeing's best-selling 737 airliner, the "MAX", in line with certification criteria. The issue that the system was designed to address was relatively mild. A little software routine was added to an existing computer to add nose-down trim in situations of higher angles of attack, to counteract the nose-up aerodynamic moment of the new, much larger, and forward-mounted engine nacelles.”
“Apparently the risk assessment for this system was not commensurate with its possible effects on aircraft behaviour and subsequently a very odd (to a safety engineer's eyes) system design was chosen, using a single non-redundant sensor input to initiate movement of the horizontal stabiliser, the largest and most powerful flight control surface. At extreme deflections, the effects of this flight control surface cannot be overcome by the primary flight controls (elevators) or the manual actuation of the trim system. In consequence, the aircraft enters an accelerated nose-down dive, which further increases the control forces required to overcome its effects.”
That sure is one hell of a privacy policy:
Information we may collect automatically includes information about:
access code , advertising IDs , apps and features you use , app usage information , clickstream data , connections to certain Services , connections to other devices , current software version , device model , device settings , Google Ad ID , hardware model , IMEI number , IP address , log information , MAC address , MNC , mobile network operator , non-persistent device identifiers , Personalized Service ID , referrer pages , sales code , search terms , serial number , subscription information , use of third-party websites , web browser characteristics , web pages you visit
https://tech-insider.org/software/research/acrobat/8308.pdf
“The promise is that the existing machines could do the job much better-more easily, more efficiently - if software were better designed.”
'Vista 8'
Invoicing large companies can also be very lucrative.
https://www.cnbc.com/2019/03/27/phishing-email-scam-stole-10...
or
Running a long company, that's where you set up a company and legitimately trade with other companies, all the while raising your credit line. Then place a massive final order and disappear.
I would have thought a scripting language would have been a better choice than unit files. The script engine would take care of verifying the script and starting the processes in the correct order and allowing/restricting access to other components. Thereby negating the need for such directives as After= or PrivateTmp=.
Joyeux Noël :D
Seeing as I was born on Christmas Day, I got only the one present, which I figured as cheating. My parents said the one present would have to do :]
Well DOH!
“An intruder could also access live camera footage from all active Ring cameras associated with an account, as well as a 30- to 60-day video history, depending on the user’s cloud storage plan.”
If its stored in the Cloud, then it ain't private.
@yahwrong: > Like the 'government agency' doesn't already posses the encryption keys or other methods to extract information from encrypted data.
Shoosh, we're all supposed to engage in the charade that it isn't going on.
From my days as a repair techie, sounds like just another board-pulling call-out job, I could do it for $343 (per hour) including VAT. But NASA would have to provide transport.
Is it technically possible to design a MMU that prevents a process reading or writing to a region of memory that don't belong to it?
https://www.nybooks.com/articles/2019/12/19/drums-of-cyberwa...
“a cybersecurity researcher .. demonstrated .. the easy availability of the .. unsecured access points of the industrial control system — the ICS — of a wastewater treatment plant not far from my home in Vermont.”
Have these people ever given consideration to not connecting their SCADA units directly to the Internet.
https://www.theregister.co.uk/2003/08/20/slammer_worm_crashe...
https://www.theregister.co.uk/2004/08/16/power_grid_cybersec...
“Such scams .. show why secondary protection mechanisms — like verbal confirmation — are necessary when making high-value transactions”
How about digital signatures and end-to-end email encryption.
I don't believe it, NotPetya was generic ransomware that spread to a lot of organizations including the NHS in England. This fiction, yet another example of the neocons attempting to demonize the Russian Federation, no doubt to distract from problems at home.
How could anyone be taken in by these kind of shysters and keeping your coins in someone else crypto-exchange kinda defeats the whole concept.
@ReptileMan >> Boeing instructed pilots to deal with excessive downward pitching
That is my favorite newspeak so far
Going by the faded out aspect of your post, someone here doesn't like you quoting facts.
@WalterBright: “These crashes are no different” ..
“1. the design shortcomings of MCAS”
“5. The flight crews did not follow the memory runaway trim procedure”
How would the pilots have switched off MCAS if they didn't know it was there?
“Boeing decided to place the engines farther forward, just in front of the wing. The new position, and the greater thrust of the engines, produced an aerodynamic challenge during a maneuver called a windup turn — a steep, banked spiral that brings a plane to the point of stall, which is required for safety tests, though it’s rarely used in typical flying.”
This is a curiously disingenuous statement. Not only at ‘windup turn’ and not only for “safety tests”, but most importantly when the engines were at maximum thrust such as at take off. Causing the air-frame to experience a pronounced nose-up attitude. The nacelles adding even more upward thrust.
‘Boeing settled on a software feature called the Maneuvering Characteristics Augmentation System. As the nose of the jet approached a high angle, suggesting an oncoming stall, MCAS would adjust the stabilizer on the plane’s tail, pushing the nose down, to alleviate the slackness in the control column. “They were trying to make it feel the same, so the pilots wouldn’t require training,”’
No, they didn't tell the pilots as this would require retraining and this would require re-certification.
“Boeing considered the MCAS feature to be so minor that it removed mention of it from the 737 MAX’s pilot manual.”
Boeing lied by omission, that's why when MCAS kicked in on those two crashes the pilots were unaware of MCAS and had no way of knowing how to recover from an MCAS induced nose dive. It was Boeing executive decisions killed those people. If this had happened in the US there would have been uproar by now.
‘.. [Intel Software Guard Extensions (SGX)] is what supposed to be secure inside Intel ships" [but, it turns out it's] really porous. You can see right through this thing."’
Have a second system that boots and secures the rest of the computer and then switches itself off. As in there is no combination of instructions that can access this second system. A bit like the Intel ME except it's actually secure from remote activation.