Curosinono

No i do not believe. You don't change it just because you say that i believe in not believing.

There is also a clear definition for it:

"Believing is the mental act of accepting something as true, real, or correct, often without requiring absolute, physical proof."

I'm absolutly fine saying that I don't know something. I do not know a god exist, or multiply etc. But honestly that question comes down to me more like "Does randomess exist".

Yes its absoutly a religios thing that homosexuality is bad. You call it yourself 'sinful relationship'. Its not a sin just because church doesn't like it. Also plenty of religions are responsible for making it a sin outside of religion.

And yes if the church condonse all sexual practices, it does include homosexuality and makes it a church doctrine.

Its a lot more fun when you start playing around with finetuning different models, learning basic differences in their architecture and co.

You can experiment with different agent harnesses (pi, hermes, opencode, goose, ..) do experiemnets with gastown and paperclip ai.

I also get a lot of fun at experimenting with ideas i have and had were the focus is not the pure programming language but the application.

But i do think and we will see, as soon as there are clear winners of agentic platforms, we will finetune and adjust these agents.

I seen this movie but it was a dystopian movie.

I can imagine an utopia though were this works out well. I can even imagine that after 100 years or 200 a lot more people become more melowed out and our society overall will be more calm.

The racial quota is used to support minorites.

You don't need to generate a new account just to spew racism.

You can argue that yo udon't think DEI helps and suggest an alternative but DEI is not racism even if you put it like this on purpose.

You are joking with your anti-DEI comment right? You do know that you do talk about the christian church?

They do nothing to include everyone. They are not standing up when it counts or excumante churches and believes who do not follow proper humanitarity.

They are not even in the forefront of fighting climate change which hurts billions.

So your main argument is, that the US American health care system is good and has to be so expensive because people can afford to pay more?!

Feel free to us europe than or germany. We pay less and more people are better of than the US Americans.

US Americans pay 2.5 times more than the avg high income nation: https://www.commonwealthfund.org/international-health-policy...

Were is the benefit of paying that much more if you are not getting older than others?

"Fornication culture" who said that? We are more people on the planet than ever. Less people have to life lies like being in a marrage but also being homosexual.

Its just a control structure from the church without education.

Its probably even because of missing education. Educate people properly and they can handle "Fornication culture".

I don't have a believe system. I have a theory why people believe in gods and religions. We have evidence for it. People studied the origin of religions:

"It evolved from humanity's psychological and social needs, primarily our desire to make sense of the natural world, cope with the fear of death, and foster community cooperation."

We know how little people knew when religion started to emerge. Never seen space, never seen above a cloud besides a few poeople going up mountains. Thunder was not understood. Between 1400-1700 we had witch trials.

It is dogma. What is your argument against dogma?

"Christianity is popular because it is rooted in many truths." were is your argument for this? Its popular due to luck, power and wars. Missionaries as well and especially probably the most critical thing: Early indoctrination.

> Compassion over brutality: This is just basic Game theory And the game has been played.

Yes exactly. Compassion wins because its better, not because religion says so. Its an evolutionary win.

Thats not true though.

First of, even per capita, the USA is at 8th place while China is 74.

For sure China has a problem due to its gigantic size and amount of people to even be able to reach its people, but the health care costs are nowere as high as USA has. USA is actually the country with the highgest % of GDP spend for health care alone.

Just checkout a YT video from an US American going to a normal chinese hospital and then compare the bill.

And in parallel the USA is dismantling medicare, medicad and co.

This is also directly reflected in the life expetency: US Americans are getting less old than Chinese people.

This is not true. The number of believers and official people in the church is continuesly declining around the globe.

1990 there were nearly 60 Million people in the church in germany (nearly everyone) now we are down to under 40 Million which crossed the line of 50%

This is real tangable progress.

The only downside is, that we do not sit together and formulate something which might give people hold who are not ready to be self stable mentally and might need something like this. And we also do not try to align together on rituals which help us to live better together.

I'm also still affected by the indoctrination of the church. As you can see, i argue against church not just because I like to argue, but because i really really hate religion and especially the christian church in germany, due to my own values and experience. This is not old i'm only 36.

I don't believe. I accept things i don't know and i know what i know.

There is no inherant issue with this. in contrary it makes me mentally stronger.

I can choose on my own terms if/when i want to end my life. If i get very sick, i don't have to hope for a god or priests blessing to end my life, i will just do it.

But religion is different: if you believe that homosexuality is wrong due to your religion, there is nothing i can argue about. Your priest told you this based on some book or story from 2000 years ago and you do not question this.

I know plenty of strong christians and muslism in germany who do not like homosexual people. And its dividing our society.

I can argue these values and we can discuss them.

If the majority says, no we want to be able to control other human beings, these people will reinact slavery. From a society point of view though we see that its not a working model anymore.

A real believe system can't be argued with. You believe in this god? This god says x and thats why you do things? Okay thats it. You don't even question were this information even came from.

If we delete all religion tomorrow and science, there is a realistic chance that the society rediscover the same existing rules like math and gravity, but religions might appear again but with different names, different rules etc.

I can change your mind with logic and arguments if its not a believe system, i can't do that with religion.

Wisdom over ignorance: The chance of survival is higher with wisdom

Compassion over brutality: This is just basic Game theory

Spite? Its not spite.

The church creates a believe system which indoctrinates all of us and took our cultures away.

The germanic tribes were believers in nature, church removed all of this.

Church also doesn't see woman as equal.

Just because they might sometimes also say postive things or things we might align, doesn't mean i need their oppinion. And especially not on hn

I would argue that they are hold back by their own culture. Hygene, safety, etc.

Higher education want to move or distant themselves from the poor, dirty or just caste separation.

If you have the feeling that certain things are not your problem, you are not rising.

You should try to see how poor US Americans have to life.

Normal people who have to wait for an event were doctors do free health care in a sport gym for a handful of days.

China is better than USA in this regard though and the only other superpower able to challange the USA.

India is not even trying despite its size and we as germans do not push the EU as a union.

I find it disappointing that a clearly political topic isn't allowed to be discussed accordingly.

The impact of religion on a lot of humans like 'everyone who isn't following the norm of religion: woman not making kids...' etc. is something you should always clarify with topics like this especially in a context were its not clear what the general consensus is.

Rape is bad, done very little to be discussed for example.

Accepting, that we do just not believe in something someone else said, is not a different kind of religion. It is acceptance and growth and mental freedom

Starship has launched today and hasn't finished everything it needs to even proof that it works reliable. For a Datacenter you need to put it higher than low orbit.

After that, you will need to start to even develoop server racks full of GPUs for space. You literlay need to engineere from scratch a cooling system which will be a few hundred square feed big. You need to be able to transfer massive amount of energy reliable from a small GPU rack to all of this area.

Than you need to send a few thousand of these constalations up there. Every single micrometeroid, sun storm, broken component means loosing a whole rack immediadlty.

Then you need to actually verify that you can send up all of that infrastructure in space and keep it alive there.

Then you have to assume a certain amount of lifetime which will be a lot shorter than on earth and you can't sell it of. These resources are gone.

To all of this cost, you will have to add latency, data syncronisation between racks has to be complelty engineered from scratch too. We talk about 100 of gigabits between these small constelations.

In the same timespan with a lot less money, you could already build a normal datacenter somewhere on the aquator or just as south in texas as possible. You can service it, you can upgrade it, no issues.

Why?

Indoctrination gives you a worldview before you can question things. Its a vocal virus.

My mother left the christian church when she was 65 with the sentence "THese old white man don't have to tell me what i can do". And the context was a cousin of us coming out as a lesbian.

I got indoctrinated by the christian church as a very young age.

This is control.

I only started to question this when I was 14 and i do remember that I had the empiphany that its okay that i might go to a hell. Then i questioned what hell would even be.

Christianity literaly controlled me through this garbage.

And its also the fault of Christian priests that apparently 'i don't understand the religion of christianity'.

Ah yes the 5 silver is a old testament thing, plenty of weird stuff in the new testament as well.

And lets not ignore the basic fact, that for Christians woman are second class citizen.

I just stoped accepting to be that ignorant and I prefer to see woman as equal, also homosexual people and co. The bishop of passau, btw. is not. He doesn't like the 'different'.

It is a language, it doesn't matter to what it is downcompiled to be able to be run in a browser.

Its now 13 years old, not a hard language to have a proper runtime for it and it would just get rid of all the npm stuff.

And for the amount of typescript we now have, it would be worth it to have proper native support.

TypeScript is now 13 years old. They could have, by now, made it a lot easier to be able to use Typescript in a browser out of the box without magic behind it.

I don't get it why the hell is TypeScript still not nativly supported in modern browsers?

What do you mean?

There is a clear phase in our history which was long and no progress was made "Dark age". In that time religion already existed right?

So what was the speciality of christianity apparently bootstrapping everything else? You could only be religious if you had resources to do so. Could have been filled with something else instead.

Napoleon wrote somewere (i read that in a museum) that education is ncessary to fight religion.

We do not know if it hold us back or not, but it also didn't push us through phases like the dark age.

But religion is primarily for control of the people. Thats why you see a lot of rules in the bible. Like paying 5 silver for raping a woman and having to take her as abride.

If you are trying to point out that there was something good with religion or necessasity of it, i'm aware of this argument.

We do not know what would have happened without religion.

Just because some aspects of it was helpful (perhaps) to our current state, doesn't mean you can be against the whole concept of it. I also do not have to bow down to it or see it as a positive because of it. I can easily call it an evil necessaity.

Yes i know. I still think its depressing.

Perhaps we use the sentiment differently?

Like the spread of the black death? I would say its depressing how fast and easy it spread.

As i wrote in my prev argument, they assumed that as non profit, they wouldt' get the capital needed to even be a frontier lab.

So nothing to loose if their model wouldn't have worked anyway.

And at the current state, its better anyway that China is pushing the non-profit/humantariy aspect of open models.

It wasn't illegal so there is some reason why the USA allowed it.

And as mentioned, they agreeed that they will not get the capital openai needs, so what did the USA people loose? A company which whouldn't have been able to do what they are known for anyway.

Again i'm not protecting the rich, i just don't think there is a real scandal and its not the same as the other 2 the newyorker mentioned

FB is the weirdest company though. For a lot of companies like gitlab you know they have sales for customers, roadmap for their core product etc.

FB has what?

Intel has around the same number of people and they make chips, laptops, different types of chips. Hardware, software, supply chain etc.

FB does what? And what do they do with all these very well paid people?!

E.H. promised her investors a magic cure -> sharlatan

Sam B. stole money from everyone -> thief

Sam A. did what?

And Musk wanted to do the same thing. Both agreeded, that a non profit will not make enough money to push the frontier. He is only pissed that he didn't get control of openai and he is now pissed again because he apparently should have done the lawsuite a few years back. Despite him having unlimited money and probably very good laywers

I'm not here to defend the richest of the richest, but E.H. and S.B. are complet different storries to OpenAI