HN user
Maker of Things.
This comic is 10 years old now, and still as relevant as ever:
http://okcancel.com/comic/3.html [Minority Users]
I wonder what cognitive scores you've got to exhibit in order to be an on-camera operator for the news?
Definitely.
There are two streams of information being analyzed. First is color, observed as one position changing properties from one frame of video to the next. Second is position, which is a change in location of things within the field of view from one frame of video to the next.
Both color and position changes can happen at the same time, but it's easier to see how this information is used if you start off by treating them separately.
For color changes, imagine video of a stationary person's face where the center pixel of every picture is the center of the face. The color at that center pixel changes from frame to frame. At frame 1 the red value (of an RGB triplet) is maybe 200 (out of 255), and by frame 5 the red value is 203. This is a temporal red shift of just 3 levels over 5 frames.
For position changes, imagine video of a beach ball in a still pool of water, where the center of the ball changes from frame to frame. At frame 1, the position is (in x,y) (512,512), and at frame 5, the position is (512, 515). This is a spatial shift of just 3 pixels over 5 frames.
In both of these cases, the observed change is probably too smal for humans to notice in casual viewing, so an exaggeration of some kind is desired. To make the change noticeable, we'll take the change of signal (3 values over 5 frames) and "amplify" it. These modified ("amplified") values will be shown on top of the original source video, resulting in an exaggerated change. If a color shifted by 3 red levels, we can show that by varying the color by 30 red levels. If a position changed by 3 pixels, we can show it changing by 12 pixels. We can choose the level of amplification best suited for observing the changes we've isolated.
Now the really cool aspect of these data streams is that their resulting "amplifications" don't need to be applied to the same data stream that they were observed in. It's possible to take a position change, and represent it as a color change. It's possible to take a color change, and stretch it out over a longer time (over more video frames). Any combination of properties you like can be used to represent your observed set of changes. Some of the most interesting representations will be a mixture of different data streams, represented as another mixture of exaggerations to the original video.
It seems like this view of physics is exactly what John Cook was talking about as the sophomore level of understanding, where questioning the foundations is correct, but misguided, because of the overall utility of the approach.
http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2011/01/25/coming-full-circle/
I think I agree though, that the timeline of science isn't the most important aspect of introductory/foundational teachings.