Brometheus

Don't live in microgravity.

Why is it on the belly then and not on the back? Countershading?

Incorrect.

Making a copy is not theft. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IeTybKL1pM4

Commit Mono, hmm? I like it.

A baby doesn't output propaganda at 6GB/s in computer readable text.

They could also, like, go back where they would show a meaningful ad every 10 videos. and not 4 with every video you attempt to watch.

Me too. They should just use the German way.

Nomens are big and other Words are small.

Smalltalk

Indeed

And windows, just behind a flag for the moment.

For me one month. After that I stopped keto due to not being able to function at work the way I wanted.

Thanks for your insight.

I love it, too.

I had nightride open for month and then the flickering crashed my Dell Monitor :joy:

I rebooted it via hard reset and opened nightride again, but I made sure to stop the flickering. :joy:

Brought to you by The Dinosaur Transitional Integration Authority

Basically solved.

Be friendly.

Insane, that that's not possible

I did this for passing parameter to a twitter card generator php script :joy:

In Germany none, because the Greens are against Putin. So instead Putin finances the people that protest against wind power and solar.

Germany can has and will very well be building hydrogen and compressed air storage.

The mutagen in TMNT is chemical in nature, is it not?

That's called god parity

See: https://reneweconomy.com.au/why-god-parity-will-be-the-end-o...

Yes, the fusion needs "huge" amounts of electrical energy input to happen, be it in the form of lasers like here or in the form of magnetic fields like in iter.

In this experiment 2.1 units of input energy produced 2.5 units of output energy. That energy has to be converted to electricity. Conversion looses like 40% of energy (escapes unsused) – so you have produced 1.5 units of electricity from 2.1 units of electricity input.

2030: bonjour

21. 2008: Arctic will Be Ice Free by 2018 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arctic_sea_ice_decline

  1.  1982 Burning fossil fuels leads to climate desaster in 2030s
  2.  1983 Burning fossil fuels leads to climate desaster in 2030s
  3.  1984 Burning fossil fuels leads to climate desaster in 2030s
  4.  1985 Burning fossil fuels leads to climate desaster in 2030s
  5.  1986 Burning fossil fuels leads to climate desaster in 2030s
  6.  1987 Burning fossil fuels leads to climate desaster in 2030s
  7.  1988 Burning fossil fuels leads to climate desaster in 2030s
  8.  1989 Burning fossil fuels leads to climate desaster in 2030s
  9.  1990 Burning fossil fuels leads to climate desaster in 2030s
 10.  1991 Burning fossil fuels leads to climate desaster in 2030s
 11.  1992 Burning fossil fuels leads to climate desaster in 2030s
 12.  1993 Burning fossil fuels leads to climate desaster in 2030s
 13.  1994 Burning fossil fuels leads to climate desaster in 2030s
 14.  1995 Burning fossil fuels leads to climate desaster in 2030s
 15.  1996 Burning fossil fuels leads to climate desaster in 2030s
 16.  1997 Burning fossil fuels leads to climate desaster in 2030s
 17.  1998 Burning fossil fuels leads to climate desaster in 2030s
 18.  1999 Burning fossil fuels leads to climate desaster in 2030s
 19.  2000 Burning fossil fuels leads to climate desaster in 2030s
 20.  2001 Burning fossil fuels leads to climate desaster in 2030s
 21.  2002 Burning fossil fuels leads to climate desaster in 2030s
 22.  2003 Burning fossil fuels leads to climate desaster in 2030s
 23.  2004 Burning fossil fuels leads to climate desaster in 2030s
 24.  2005 Burning fossil fuels leads to climate desaster in 2030s
 25.  2006 Burning fossil fuels leads to climate desaster in 2030s
 26.  2007 Burning fossil fuels leads to climate desaster in 2030s
 27.  2008 Burning fossil fuels leads to climate desaster in 2030s
 28.  2009 Burning fossil fuels leads to climate desaster in 2030s
 29.  2010 Burning fossil fuels leads to climate desaster in 2030s
 30.  2011 Burning fossil fuels leads to climate desaster in 2030s
 31.  2012 Burning fossil fuels leads to climate desaster in 2030s
 32.  2013 Burning fossil fuels leads to climate desaster in 2030s
 33.  2014 Burning fossil fuels leads to climate desaster in 2030s
 34.  2015 Burning fossil fuels leads to climate desaster in 2030s
 35.  2016 Burning fossil fuels leads to climate desaster in 2030s
 36.  2017 Burning fossil fuels leads to climate desaster in 2030s
 37.  2018 Burning fossil fuels leads to climate desaster in 2030s
 38.  2019 Burning fossil fuels leads to climate desaster in 2030s
 39.  2020 Burning fossil fuels leads to climate desaster in 2030s
 40.  2021 Burning fossil fuels leads to climate desaster in 2030s

Yeah, but you can't since the energy produced is in form of heat and radiation and not electricity.

That is like using lasers to start a fire and then saying: Look the fire is producing energy in the form of heat! But the heat has to be turned to electricity to power the lasers. And then the fire better produce enough heat to produce enough electricity to power the lasers...

Don't get your hopes up yet: This just demonstrated that the released energy (in form of heat etc) is higher than the energy input – yet the released energy hadn't been converted to electricity that could have powered the lasers.

Supposedly this would be done by a heat engine, with can normally extract 60% of energy input. So 2.5 * 0.6 = 1.5, so it is yet again not producing any surplus energy.

Yeah, ever read the story? it ends with the wolf eating every sheep.

Yet you yourself provide no substance to the discussion and just formulate some centrist statements without any points adding to the discussion.