HN user
I agree. One point that is often missed is that those same executives were financially incentivised for Horizon to work by having their £1m+ bonuses tied to it.
They need to be held accountable and jailed if found guilty.
I guess this was after the Russian aircraft dumped fuel on it and collided with the prop?
Who is a more trustworthy source? Unfortunately not a single word from the Russian official sources can be taken seriously.
I like Clickspring - https://youtube.com/@Clickspring
The series for his build of a Anthikythera mechanism is great to watch.
The red line indicates the hard shoulder but yes, even after the law change here in UK I have not seen much actual change on the road tbh regarding middle-lane hogging.
People are either ignorant, lazy or don't care as there is very little chance of being caught.
Who said anything about an empire? That is obviously not going to work and is not what the EU is.
The EU is far from perfect but is an early iteration of a workable model. I can’t see this happening even in somewhere with a pretty similar societal model as the US currently as the political siuation is so polarised.
In UK it is not even a requirement for an ISP to keep those records but that is not the topic to address, so who is able to legally obtain that data and is it something that you are reasonably likely to do?
You can see why people err on the side of caution.
This was the finding of the case Patrick Breyer vs Germany in 2016
https://www.whitecase.com/publications/alert/court-confirms-...
What makes a dynamic IP address personal data?there is another party (such as an ISP) that can link the dynamic IP address to the identity of an individual; and the website operator has a "legal means" of obtaining access to the information held by the ISP in order to identify the individual. On the facts, if the BRD has the legal power to compel the relevant ISP to disclose sufficient information to identify Mr Breyer, then Mr Breyer's IP address will be personal data in the hands of the BRD.
The CJEU also did not ask the specific question in that case - Were the BRD LIKELY to identify Mr Breyer? If this is something that you have never done before or will do in the future then it is not likely that you will try to identify someone by their IP.
It is quite easy really. If you are not able to identify a person by IP it is not PII. It MAY be PII for ISPs for example if they are able to associate the IPs to customers so they would have to treat it as such.
Same here. I ran an rt-66n for years on advanced Tomato until updates stopped. I moved to OPNSense on a APU2 which is fine for my current connection speed (80/20mbit).
I haven't bought a Sony product since this time.
On Macs they now have Thunderbolt over USB-C e.g. the port works for both standards.
I have an APU2 as the primary OPNSense router at home and picked up an HP T6xx thin client as a backup. There are a lot of small, low powered x86 boxes that will run OPNSense well but it is pretty common knowledge so prices have risen.
The current goto is commercial display PCs with multiple NICs otherwise there are some great micro PCs e.g. Qotom.
Whatever you choose, buy two if your data is real important or replicate to the cloud.
I use Synology with one box having 4 disks in RAID5 and the second having one large disk with the most important data replicated over.
Is it actually fake? It isn't clear from the comments.
Ex-avionics engineer here.
If there was a risk to the aircraft, do you think that safety point would be left to the passenger to turn off the device? Of course not so if there was any risk at all of them being used they would not have been allowed on the aircraft.
Or OPNSense.
It doesn't but you have to stream from somewhere and my phone and Mac can turn the soundbar on/off.
Nice work and I bet was a great sense of achievement.
There is a pretty easy solution to this which is what I use although significantly less fun.
An A1392 Airport Express which go for around £40 and a 3.5mm to TOSLink optical cable.