HN user
Current scientific evidence does not support the idea that soy is harmful to males.
Not true: "Feminizing effect of phytoestrogens and soy products may be subtle, detectable only statistically in large populations; it can be of particular importance for children and adolescents." [0]
Jury is still out on soy. If you've had to deal with the latest league of junior devs, it makes sense why they're called "soydevs."
It's not the best deal for us, though, since they're not part of our tax base, nor are they growing families and social networks here for us to benefit from.
It's a fantastic deal for us because they're not immigrating here and therefore driving prices of housing, social services, etc. to the unsustainable levels we're seeing now. Outsourcing over the past decades has been a huge boon for the US. They're generating value for US companies and we're able to take advantage of that. The US needs to grow its own families and social networks organically. Every country should.
but the one thing it doesn't do is optimize for the interests of America.
Generating wealth for US companies and providing stability to their home countries is a win/win. This is optimal for US interests.
You're getting down voted for this heterodox opinion. Flooding the West with foreigners is orthodoxy to the left. Any other opinion is heresy.
Let me rephrase since my original reply got [flagged].
So...transphobia
Stating biological facts and reality doesn't mean something that shatters the narrative is "transphobic". Men (male humans) cannot get pregnant.
Islamophobia
Being against a religion that stones "adulterous" rape victims, executes gays by throwing them off the roof, and beheads those who dare insult their religion isn't a phobia of any kind, it's common sense.
anti-black racism
Objective sociological facts are not racism.
In other words, you just want to be able to be every kind of bigot and never suffer consequences for it.
Translation: "These are uncomfortable narrative shattering facts designed to tell the unadulterated truth that are heretical, so I'd rather pretend like they don't have any value, use fascism, ad hominem, and Gestapo-level tactics to quell social opponents and heretics."
Thanks for highlighting exactly what people actually mean when they initially try to talk about it with vague accusations of “most things classified as hate speech are actually harmless
Glad to be of assistance. Just because you feel objectively true narrative shattering facts are harmful doesn't mean they are. Not everyone is as thin-skinned, weak, and intolerant as you.
doing so in the exact manner I had said you would
What exact manner, stating uncomfortable narrative shattering facts that overlords don't want anyone to see? I agree! I stated uncomfortable truth, facts, and reality that must be banned by those steeped in wokeism.
complete with sock puppet accounts along the way.
None of those other posters are me. Hilarious how anyone who disagrees with you must be using sock puppets. It's a delusional take, which isn't surprising coming from someone who thinks men can get pregnant.
Since my original reply got [flagged] let me rephrase:
So absolutely nothing of any value and just a bunch of made up bullshit designed to target people based on their race, religion, sexuality and gender because you’re an ignorant and insecure dipshit who is too scared to attach their own name to it?
Translation: "So uncomfortable narrative shattering facts designed to tell the unadulterated truth are heretical so I'd rather pretend like they don't have any value, use ad hominem, and Gestapo-level tactics to quell social opponents and heretics."
Just because certain truths and facts are uncomfortable doesn't mean the aforementioned quotes are "made up bullshit" nor "hate speech." They are facts. Uncomfortable, narrative shattering heretical facts, but facts nonetheless.
I think T-Mobile not allowing you to spam this nonsense to people is something everyone is ok with.
You may be too young to remember, but this is the exact line of reasoning conservatives used in the 90s to pressure companies to not support LGBTQ, atheism, foul language in music, etc.
Really it’s a very specific kind of moron who will absolutely insist that the real secrets in life are all predicated around people who have a different skin color or religion are the real problem and will then quote evidence to you that doesn’t hold up to even the most gentle scrutiny all while they insist that they are the smartest person in the room.
You legitimately could be talking about SJW/the woke and everything you said applies.
Affirmative Action != DEI
PC != Woke
These are different terms for different concepts, even if there's some overlap.
I think you don't understand. Qubes relies on software virtualization in conjunction with hardware assisted virtualization instruction sets. The aforementioned vulnerability existed in Qubes Xen.
Everyone falls for this illusion across all countries and cultures, so much so that folks hypothesized it is affected by our biology. Well, until some anthropologist showed it to some African tribesman. It turns out they were not susceptible to that form of illusion at all. It is unclear why.
That was disproven. This is scientific racism/bio-essentialism. Let's not go there, it's an evil path.
Last time VT-d virtualization was escaped was in 2006 and done by the Qubes founder herself:
Have you been living under a rock [0]?
How is it about the containers?
Container security aka OS virtualization has been quite secure for a while now.
[0] https://www.csoonline.com/article/551445/significant-virtual...
This is paywalled and archives are not able to get around said paywall. I am unable to view this article.
This is quite an important topic go discuss because the ramifications of its implementation are everywhere. Does anyone have a link handy so that I may read the article?
Not any more it isn't. Rootless non-root containers are about as secure as VMs today.
I would be pretty surprised if it was being that clever.
"I would be pretty surprised if a website known for clever wit and satire was being clever."
Even if it's referencing conspiracy theories, it's still satire. Congrats, you played yourself.
"Satire is a genre of the visual, literary, and performing arts, usually in the form of fiction and less frequently non-fiction, in which vices, follies, abuses, and shortcomings are held up to ridicule, often with the intent of exposing or shaming the perceived flaws of individuals, corporations, government, or society itself into improvement." [0]
[0] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satire
Considering the thousands of deaths and people murdered by the US government in places like Libya while Hillary Clinton fumbled foreign policy as Secretary of State, the article is clearly, by definition, satire. QED.
Watching leftists flip flop on free speech in real time after Elon took over gave me whiplash.
Why not just do all that in a throwaway container?
I had to reread that multiple times and cringed every time. It's clear the author has never heard a person with a Southern accent pronounce "fish."
I can't wait for this. I will be first in line for an EV Jetta with physical buttons! So many consumers are asking for this.
Based. Glad there's a refuge for sane developers that are tired of the long march of Woke destroying so many other language.
Based. This tells me the creator is sane and has his head screwed on properly.
Poe's Law. That leaked video is so insane, I can't help but think it's satire.
Cantrill today on Twitter: "It's occurring to me that AI doomerism is overwhelmingly white, male, Millennial, and childless -- and that this tells us more about them than about them than it does about the future of humanity"
Identity politics is a brain cancer that kills the host. Imagine if someone Tweeted "It's occurring to me that doomerism is overwhelmingly white, female, Millennial, and childless -- and that this tells us more about them than about them than it does about the future of humanity."
"Help! Misogyny!" [0]
[0] https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fs...
Just because it stings doesn't make it absurd
eBPF and DTrace exist on orthogonal systems
That was true 15 years ago. eBPF and DTrace exist on some of the same systems now, Linux and Windows.
and most using eBPF have never even used DTrace, let alone "moved on" from it
The performance and tracing groups at Microsoft certainty have. Same with Oracle, Netflix, among others.
The systems are really quite different, and have different design centers; for the use case of instrumenting the system for purposes of understanding it
True, but unfortunately for DTrace, it is too late. Oracle should have done this years ago. Now Linux has a more powerful tracer builtin, eBPF, and it would be a backwards step to switch the kernel code to DTrace. [0]
[0] From the man that wrote the books: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16377141
The realtor cartels that control the listing databases should be made illegal. I don't have to go through a middleman to take some pictures, write a blurb and input some data to sell my truck. I shouldn't have to go through the same to sell my house.
It was not fake news
Yes it was.
there is strong evidence which does not conclusively prove its use
There is no strong evidence of any kind that it was improperly used.
There's also new evidence of them using it again in Lebanon.
Also fake news.
Which of the hospital bombings are you referring to? All or one of them?
The large one that supposedly killed 500 people in OCT. The rest of them are fake news as well.
Where I grew up, that was called being polite and it didn’t automatically rule out anything other that liberalism.
Where I grew up, that was called being polite and it didn’t automatically rule out anything other that conservatism.
There’s a ton of room between disagreement and harassment.
There was a time where that may have been true, but we're far away from those times.
4chan, 8chan, Kiwifarms, et al. are about as close to that as you can get. Probably full free speech on some boards of 4chan and 8chan.
Do you equate freedom of speech with "abuse, harassment, and harm"?
Almost anything in CURRENT_YEAR can be interpreted as "abuse, harassment, and harm" by someone. Is saying "fuck Christianity and fuck White men" abusive, harassing, or harmful? What if Christians and White men interpret that as harmful? Will they take that down?
Were these activities you wanted to perform in order to sign up?
Again, something as benign as "men cannot get pregnant" was a non-issue fifteen years ago. Now, that makes you a transphobic neo-Nazi.
Dtrace is a generation behind eBPF. There's a reason why the tracing community has moved on to eBPF and is no longer interested in dtrace.
I wonder how much money Apple would make by releasing an Android app that for $1 a month, would allow Android users the ability to have a "blue bubble" or whatever.