AEVL

How does the analysis look if we only count the >=90 severity cases—that is, if we downgrade the severity of all <90 cases to 0?

Just some trivia (and an aside):

The collaboration is with Issey Miyake. Steve Jobs black turtlenecks was Issey Miyakes:

https://www.forbes.com/sites/jenniferhicks/2022/08/10/heres-...

(As an aside, I swear by pants from the Issey Miyake Homme Plissé collection. Since investing in some pairs about 10 years ago, I have hardly worn anything else—no other pants match their comfort. The iPhone Pocket is of course ridiculous anyway.)

"spouses of Maxis employees vs Maxis"

where can I read more about this?

Why not instead have

hash(-1)=-2,

hash(-2)=-3,

hash(-3)=-4,

and so on?

The Artist (2011)

I might be splitting hairs now. Is not ambiguity the problem in your examples, and not any off-by-one error? If the respective ambiguities were resolved then there should be no off-by-one errors.

Of course use of expressions may vary. My in-spirit-meaning of ‘off-bye-one error’ may differ from yours, and that is fine. (Had it really mattered in a discussion then we would simply agree to find a suitable definition of the expression.)

Not an off-by-one error—at least not in spirit. Interesting nonetheless.

I expected the article to eventually answer this puzzle:

The competition started and got through a number of rounds. There were some comments about how the climber on the left always won.

Near the end:

The kicker is that the out of place hold hasn’t been used in a long time. The climbers have optimised their route such that it is skipped. The same happens to the fourth hold from the bottom. So either being in the wrong place is immaterial to the climbers’ technique as long as they don’t get in the way.

So it seems like the error discovered by the article author should not have conferred any advantage to the climber on the left.

Anyone who can shine light on this matter?

What do you have in mind with “… until the 2000s”?

According to Wikipedia:

“ Compulsory sterilisation in Sweden were sterilisations which were carried out in Sweden, without a valid consent of the subject, during the years 1906–1975 on eugenic, medical and social grounds.”

So the main sterilization program ended 1975. However:

“Between 1972 and 2013, sterilisation was also a condition for gender reassignment surgery.”

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compulsory_sterilisation_in_...

First, you can have a type-checker check the currency; that doesn't have to be a runtime error: Money<Usd> m = …; There will, of course, be instances where you must handle currency dynamically.

With dependent types, checking for currency validity may be handled at compile-time. (This is touched upon in the post linked in the comment you replied to.)

For the case of conversion between currencies of monetary amounts:

https://github.com/anderslundstedt/type-experiments#type-saf...