"It's a Mossanite"
"...a...what-a-nite?"
"A Mossainite. Artificial, spurious, not-genuine and it's worth....fuck all"
HN user
"It's a Mossanite"
"...a...what-a-nite?"
"A Mossainite. Artificial, spurious, not-genuine and it's worth....fuck all"
Hokkaido.
...which is why for determining if something is unknown, you ask SQL...are you indeed NULL? And SQL should say 'true' or 'false'.
SQL null IS null"There are no particles, only waves."
I agree with this comment because ML comprises some techniques that are still not understood [1].
I would like to think that statistics comes more from a pure math approach, loosely, while ML comes from an applied math approach, loosely. ML works spectacularly well on a class of problems. Why it does what it does is (in)conveniently brushed under the rug. How you treat that (in)convenience is left to you.
[1] https://www.quantamagazine.org/20151203-big-datas-mathematic...