GNU Screen - A Hacker's Ideal Terminal

http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/aix/library/au-gnu_screen/

by soundphed • 17 years ago

186 100 17 years ago

dryicerx• 17 years ago

I don't think I can live without it anymore.

There is no reason why you shouldn't use screen when ssh'ing in and working on remote machines, it will save you tons of time in case the connection goes down, plus allows your to keep a persistent working environment on remote boxes.

    ssh -t user@host screen -rx

That will drop you immediately to a running screen on connect

mooism22• 17 years ago

My remote `.bash_profile` ends

    screen -d -R
    logout

On the rare occasions that I don't want to run under screen, I run `ssh -t user@host bash`.

pyre11• 17 years ago

I hope you mean on the server. IIRC, some things like GNOME will source .profile or .bash_profile so that you can have globally customized $PATH,etc variables.

wglb• 17 years ago

Highly valuable.

See http://renesd.blogspot.com/2009/09/screen-for-ghetto-servers... for more pointers.

elbenshira• 17 years ago

Screen uses C-a as its "command" character. Unfortunately, C-a means "go to start of line" in emacs and terminals. The solution?

In your .screenrc file:

    escape ^Ww

This will default C-w as the command character.

cschep• 17 years ago

Isn't C-w kill-region in emacs? I recently came up against this problem too, but what else to change it to .. ?

jherdman• 17 years ago

I'm using C-z, but it's sort of an awkward key to use.

sjs4• 17 years ago

You could try C-o (open-line by default) or C-z (suspend/minimize by default). I use C-z as a personal command prefix. Emacs really puts those ctrl shortcuts to work, it's damn near impossible to find one that I don't use at least semi-regularly.

edit: You could maybe try C-9 or use a symbol. I was only thinking in letters.

twism• 17 years ago

I use

escape ^^^

Ctrl+Shift 6

steveklabnik2• 17 years ago

I'd suggest changing it to vim.

But no, seriously, screen is one of the more useful programs I've ever used. I have a screen session running on a server somewhere, and just log into it from whatever terminal I happen to be using at the time. It's pretty much the best.

silentbicycle11• 17 years ago

I like ` (just backtick, no control), though that clashes with Lisp a bit. (I don't usually use Lisp inside tmux, though.)

warp• 17 years ago

I used ctrl-z, when I'm in screen I rarely need to push something to the background (prefer to just start a new vc in screen), and ofcourse I can still background something with ctrl-z z.

A screen within a screen gets ctrl-v, just because it seems mostly unused and is next to z on a dvorak keyboard :)

(And no, I don't ever nest them any deeper).

fhars2• 17 years ago

I use C-z as escape in screen. This would be "send process to background" in a vanilla shell, which I don't need that often in screen.

philh• 17 years ago

I bound my left winkey to @, and use ^@. I wanted to bind it directly to NUL, but I couldn't get that to work for some reason.

pbhjpbhj• 17 years ago

Which is word delete in bash &c..

Ctrl+T is the menu access character in aptitude, is there any convention around that?

tome3• 17 years ago

You can start screen with -e to pass the control character in. I use

% screen -e^]]

Then Ctrl-] is my escape.

hazzen• 17 years ago

You can also just hit "C-a a", which screen will interpret as "send C-a to the terminal".

btw0• 17 years ago

I recently found BSD implementation -- tmux better than GNU screen.

tome3• 17 years ago

Better in what way?

silentbicycle11• 17 years ago

For starters, it has built-in dwm/XMonad-style layouts, while screen has taken ages to even get vertically split windows.

JeremyChase• 17 years ago

Screen is an amazingly useful tool. If you aren't using it or something like it, you are really making life more difficult for yourself.

If you want something that isn't GNU or GPL'd, take a look at `tmux`.

e1ven• 17 years ago

I'm just curious- Why would you want to specifically avoid the GPL?

steveklabnik2• 17 years ago

If you look at it through the eyes of the GNU people, you're making an active choice any time you use software. By using GNU software, you're supporting the FSF and the GNU project.

Some people would rather support the BSD license instead.

Other people just don't care at all.

pyre11• 17 years ago

The same way there are people that want their entire software usage to be GPL/MIT/BSD/etc, there are people that want everything to be non-GPL. Unless you are going to be hacking on GNU Screen and feel the need to do something that the GPL forbids, there's really no reason to stop yourself from using a software package just because it's GPL-licensed.

apotheon5• 17 years ago

http://copyfree.org

http://softwareliberationfront.org

. . . and other reasons.

tome3• 17 years ago

All my rxvts run screen automatically. This means if I then leave my workstation and need to access one of the terminals remotely I can just duplicate it with screen -x.

[Edited for clarity]

hugothefrog• 17 years ago

I've been using Screen for a number of years now, but I've recently come across Ubuntu's repackaging of it - https://help.ubuntu.com/9.04/serverguide/C/screen-profiles.h.... This seems like a fantastic way to introduce screen to new users, who are probably intimidated by screen's default bare-bones config.

Keyframe• 17 years ago

I use screen for bazillion of years already. When doing stuff with django I like to C-a c to make a new screen, then C-a :resize 10 so that I have two screens on one (you can switch between them with C-a TAB). So in the smaller one I run server and in larger whatever I need to. Excellent when having two or more monitors with one being dedicated to full screen terminal setup like that.

silentbicycle11• 17 years ago

You might want to consider tmux (http://tmux.sourceforge.net/) as an alternative. Its cleaner (and, incidentally, BSD-licensed) codebase means that it's getting features that have been gathering dust on screen's to-do list for ages. Most notably, its dwm/XMonad-style layouts (http://tmux.sourceforge.net/tmux6.png) are really nice. AFAICT, screen doesn't even officially have vertically split windows yet, it's still an unofficial patch.

Either way, if you use Unix, learn to use screen or tmux. They're tremendouslyuseful. (Also: Noisy wireless connections are the new flaky dialup, when it comes to resuming shell sessions.)

pyre11• 17 years ago

No offense, but how does it's BSD-licensed codebase mean that it 'gets more features'?

silentbicycle11• 17 years ago

I rephrased my comment - I think it's the cleaner codebase that makes the big difference. Its BSD license has some perks, though - for one thing, it's part of the OpenBSD base system now, which means security auditing and excellent maintainers. That will probably also lead to more features in the long run.

OpenBSD man page: http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=tmux

soundphed3• 17 years ago

Thanks, I will look at that, looks rad! I just thought the article covered some really key points about multiplexing terminals in general...

jacquesm2• 17 years ago

What does 'looks rad' mean ?

blasdel2• 17 years ago

tmux is not rad, just clean -- see http://caca.zoy.org/wiki/neercs for a truly radical screen replacement:

  Grab a process that you forgot to start inside neercs
  Great screensaver
  Real time thumbnails of your shells
  Special effects when closing a window
  Various window layouts...

duskwuff2• 17 years ago

I was able to make tmux hang in a matter of a few minutes of playing with it (and not even trying hard). It's definitely got promise, but it also still has a way to go.

silentbicycle11• 17 years ago

Can you reproduce it, or describe what you did? In a couple months of using it constantly on three systems, I've never had a single problem with it.

JulianMorrison• 17 years ago

How does that compare to dvtm?

http://www.brain-dump.org/projects/dvtm/

silentbicycle11• 17 years ago

Interesting. I haven't heard of that before, I'll look into it. I doubt a comparison based on a first impression would be useful, though.

Hackbrot• 17 years ago

Nice piece of software.

noonespecial• 17 years ago

Many thanks for posting this. This is exactly the kind of thing I come to HN to find. I use screen on occasion but never really had it in my mind that I should be using it as a productivity tool.

I have once again found minor enlightenment and am already more productive because of it. Its nice when procrastinating on HN turns into a net win!

tlrobinson• 17 years ago

I've been satisfied with just using multiple tabs in Terminal.app in OS X, but I'm curious if anyone has switched from that solution to screen and wouldn't go back? (for local use in particular)

potatolicious• 17 years ago

I use screen constantly and would never go back. The detachability is incredibly useful. Say I had to go to a meeting - I shut my laptop and it goes to sleep. This would normally kill any SSH session (and thus leave vim swap files lying about in my case)... but with screen I can just pick up where I left off last time.

It's also great if you want to run something big - say a job that would take 5 hours. I'm free to do whatever I want without fear that killing my ssh session will also kill the job.

silentbicycle11• 17 years ago

> run something big - say a job that would take 5 hours

The monitor function can also notify you when there's activity or 30 sec. silence in a window, too. :)

scott_s• 17 years ago

Your second scenario can be handled with nohup from within a vanilla ssh session.

sjs4• 17 years ago

You can copy and paste between terminals with the keyboard. This alone should be reason enough.

EAMiller• 17 years ago

I got frustrated with tabs in Terminal.app because of the keyboard shortcuts : Shift+Apple+arrows

In screen I use ^a, " to get a list of screens, then j/k to pick a screen. That may not seem like a win, but it keeps my fingers on the home keys, and feels smoother.

That and the fact that I split windows in screen fairly often means I won't go back to terminal tabs...

sofal• 17 years ago

I've switched from Terminal.app tabs to screen for a couple of reasons:

1) It's obvious why you'd want this for remote sessions, and I want a consistent feel whether I'm sshing into remote machines or just on my local machine.

2) I like to allocate a different screen session for each project. I can use the Terminal.app tabs to differentiate between these and between remote sessions on other machines. I could technically use multiple Terminal.app windows instead, but meh.

One thing I've found to be annoying: I can't get gnuplot to work from within a screen window (using the default AquaTerm output).

pyre11• 17 years ago

I know that there was a patch (a long time ago ~2006) for gnome-terminal that made it 'screen aware' so that each screen 'window' was a gnome-terminal tab.

bdotdub• 17 years ago

anyone care to share their screenrc? heres mine: http://github.com/bdotdub/dotfiles/blob/master/screenrc

DannoHung• 17 years ago

I keep mine pretty simple too: http://github.com/DannoHung/my-config-files/blob/master/.scr...

silentbicycle11• 17 years ago

The most notable part of mine is

   # Set up my status line at the bottom of every frame
   caption always "%{gb}  %{ck}%m-%d %C %{gb}  %{gb}%?%-Lw%?%{ck}%n*%f %t%?(%u)%?%{gb}%?%+Lw%?"

I use tmux now, though. (it has a statusbar similar to the above by default)

surki2• 17 years ago

I posted my config sometime back. http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=843630

jazzychad2• 17 years ago

I use screen every day for administering multiple remote servers. I don't know how I functioned before I used screen. One of the coolest things are "backtick" commands you can put in the caption string. Here is a pastie of my screenrc and one of the backtick files which displays the free RAM of the system in the caption line, updating every 30 seconds (ymmv on the free RAM command depending on how your distro's `free` command displays its output)

http://pastie.org/633808

mcantor2• 17 years ago

I often use idiosyncratic screen setups with very specifically-purposed windows. I support this behavior with a special config file that launches screen with certain windows pre-loaded for certain uses:

  source /home/mcantor/.screenrc
  chdir $SANDBOX/src
  screen 0:svn
  screen 1:lib
  screen 2:nosetests
  stuff "activate_environment\015"
  screen 3:ipython
  stuff "activate_environment\015ipython\015"
  screen 4:
  select 0

I use stuff because it's the most straightforward way to send commands with carriage returns (015 in octal) to a window.

I make this even more effortless by using a special alias in my .bashrc:

  alias scd='screen -c /home/mcantor/.screenrc-dev'

I also use a few other aliases to support common uses:

  alias scr='screen -rd'
  alias scx='screen -x'
  alias lsc='screen -list'

Also, don't forget the very useful -S switch:

  screen -S someproject

Or, you can use Ctrl-a :sessionname, if you're already within a session, to rename it. That way, screen -list and screen -r can use your sessionnames, and you don't have to parse or remember the process ID's.

pyre11• 17 years ago

I really wish there was a way to use the sessionname in the hard status line formatting.

mcantor2• 17 years ago

You're probably never going to read back this far in time, but, it's coming in the next version.

TallGuyShort• 17 years ago

This IS a hacker's ideal Terminal - a while ago I set out to write my own shell with all the features I wanted. A huge portion of the functionality I intended to implement is accomplished with GNU Screen. Since I found Screen - I haven't felt enough need to keep developing my own shell!

garply• 17 years ago

In the same vein, if you use a repl on a remote machine you should check out detachtty if you're not already using it. It's particularly nice for use within emacs because it doesn't eat the whole screen and it doesn't eat ^A.

jazzychad2• 17 years ago

fwiw, screen doesn't "eat ^A"

You can send ^a to a window in screen by typing "^a a" - I do this everyday using emacs inside of screen. It becomes second nature.

coryrc• 17 years ago

I changed to C-\

mdakin• 17 years ago

It also gives OSX RS-232 terminal emulation capability. As far as I know OSX ships with no other such program. Once you get your USB dongle's driver situation under control you just:

screen device baud

ex:

screen /dev/tty.usbserial-FTDPZOEJ 115200

Very useful for embedded system hackers and others who still need to speak RS-232.

blasdel2• 17 years ago

I have not used a single other serial console since I accidentally discovered this feature in screen a few years ago. Hyperterminal, minicom, gtkterm, et. al. were the bane of my existence.

mmagin• 17 years ago

Actually, OS X includes "cu" -- not that feature-rich, but it's been sufficient for me.

soundphed3• 17 years ago

I found this link on how to patch/compile Screen 4.0.3 on Snow Leopard...the one out of the box is kind of buggy, and does not support 256 colors...

http://trac.macports.org/ticket/20862

Luyt• 17 years ago

'dtach' is a nice utility too, a kind of lightweight-screen. It's in the BSD ports.

barrkel4• 17 years ago

The difficulty of scrolling back in the buffer (C-a ESC PgUp is a longer and more tedious key sequence than Shift+PgUp), and lack of full terminal support (e.g. man, less, etc. don't restore screen contents on exit) mean I strictly only use screen on ssh connections.

Perhaps the terminal support issue could be worked out with better termcap etc. settings, but I haven't found the answers. I asked questions here:

http://superuser.com/questions/23144/how-to-make-screen-term...

... but no luck.

decklin• 17 years ago

try "altscreen on". (see also the -a option, and http://www.gnu.org/software/screen/manual/html_node/Window-T...).

barrkel4• 17 years ago

The -a option didn't work, but altscreen on in my ~/.screenrc seems to have worked. Thanks!

pyre11• 17 years ago

> (C-a ESC PgUp is a longer and more tedious key sequence than Shift+PgUp)

Try entering Copy Mode ('C-a ['). Once in Copy Mode you can page up and down without any modifiers. Just hit ']' to exit Copy Mode. You can also use the up and down arrows in Copy Mode. It's mostly meant for selecting regions of text to yank, but I find it's the easiest way to access the scrollback buffer.

barrkel4• 17 years ago

C-a ESC is copy mode, as far as I am aware. At least that's what it says down the bottom of the screen when I do it.

To be clear, C-a ESC puts me in a mode where I can then freely page through the scrollback buffer with PgUp and PgDn, but the problem is that's 4 key presses required for something that only needs 2 in a normal terminal, and Ctrl (with A), Esc, and PgUp are about as far apart as you can get on a keyboard, which doesn't make for efficiency.

chwahoo• 17 years ago

Screen is great. I wish there were an analogous tool that let me group several running X apps into a long-running session that I could connect to/disconnect from locations. Any idea if this is possible today?

fhars2• 17 years ago

NX is supposedly able to do this, but last time I looked (which, admittedly, was two or three years ago) you had to expect serious problems if the set of available fonts on the different display servers was different (i.e. in all realistic scenarios). Oh, and it only worked on x86-32.

abhijithoskeri• 17 years ago

http://partiwm.org/wiki/xpra

pyre11• 17 years ago

I realize that this is really old, but I came back searching for something in the comments, and I now have something to add to this. I came across something (that is no longer maintained) called xmove which was describe as 'screen for X11'. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xmove

apotheon5• 17 years ago

I prefer tmux.

lanaer• 17 years ago

I installed tmux, but have not yet played with it. I know I want to, simply because it supports vertical splits…

GNU Screen - A Hacker's Ideal Terminal

Related Stories