Cyphertite: 8 GB free encrypted backup with CLI client for Linux and Windows

https://www.cyphertite.com/

by iamthedata • 12 years ago

15 16 12 years ago

cyphertite.com

gherkin2• 12 years ago

How is this different to Tresorit(https://tresorit.com/)?

jonathonf• 12 years ago

Linux client, and the client source code is also available.

JoshTriplett• 12 years ago

I didn't see an Open Source license listed anywhere on the website, so I downloaded the client to verify. Looks like Cyphertite uses the ISC license, an all-permissive Open Source license.

gherkin2• 12 years ago

Tresorit has a Linux client:

https://tresorit.com/download/linux

dchest• 12 years ago

Oh, these are the guys that are confused about XTS mode[1], thinking it was designed for protecting "bulk data". See my wonderful exchange with them on Twitter:

https://twitter.com/Cyphertite/status/450616668126203904

https://twitter.com/Cyphertite/status/450616106001399808

which ended up with them calling me "some jerk on twitter who has nothing better to do than talk shit".

https://twitter.com/Cyphertite/status/450623654288969728

—

[1] See this tptacek's post explaining XTS: http://sockpuppet.org/blog/2014/04/30/you-dont-want-xts/

michaelmior• 12 years ago

Hmm, that last tweet is enough to make me disregard this and wish I hadn't upvoted.

discardorama• 12 years ago

I keep seeing this in your blog post: "Attackers could [rewrite] /bin/ls into a bindshell."

What does that mean? And how is it related to disk encryption?

nobodysfool• 12 years ago

ls is a file listing in unix/linux. a 'bindshell' would essentially open a telnet port that goes directly into a command line shell. So, if your system was attacked, you might (since it's the most often command typed) use the 'ls' command to list your files. When you do that, you also open a shell on a specific port on your computer that has root access.

aroch• 12 years ago

Bindshells are shells that are bound to a port, see Wiki for a brief explanation[1]. Basically, without authentication you have no way of knowing that the `ls` you backed up is the same `ls` you get back out. If your remote backup is compromised and uses XTS, its possible for someone to own you by replacing an oft used binary that when run gives them a remote shell.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shellcode

On the other hand, if the attacker needs to create the connection, the shellcode is called a bindshell because the shellcode binds to a certain port on which the attacker can connect to control it.

dobbsbob• 12 years ago

It's in Niels Ferguson's public comments to NIST regarding XTS-AES and storage that's not on physical hardware. tptacek explained it in his comments how this attack works if you search them https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7675698#up_7676864

This service if I remember encrypts files/container with user keys then they encrypt it again on their cloud backup with their key, so it's not an encrypted backup sitting on a dropbox server. Of course you have to trust their keys won't be stolen by somebody wanting at those XTS-AES encrypted backups.

Mandatum• 12 years ago

You'd be essentially wilfully ignoring a massive security hole which would allow complete "pwnage" of the box.

AdmiralAsshat• 12 years ago

Yikes. If you're going to accuse everyone around you of being snakeoil salesmen, you probably shouldn't defend the fidelity of your own stuff by insulting the skeptics.

newscracker• 12 years ago

There are a few reasons why many people would not (or should not) use Cyphertite:

* It's been such a long time in development and there's still no client for OS X. Building from source should be an option, not the only way, if this is ever meant for mass adoption.

* There's no information about accessing backup files from mobile devices.

* Most importantly, unless you have more than 100GB of data to backup, you're better off with the premium plan (enterprise segment) than the expensive personal plan where you would get a lot lesser in return.[1] I had pointed this out to them a year or two ago, but there's been no change and this structure does not make sense for the section of home users who may have only a few tens of GBs to backup.

[1] https://www.cyphertite.com/plans.php

2bluesc2• 12 years ago

More technical links for those interested:

https://opensource.conformal.com/wiki/cyphertite

https://github.com/conformal/cyphertite

2bluesc2• 12 years ago

The github.com/conformal account shows a lot of Bitcoin projects, I wonder why they don't accept Bitcoin.

iamthedata• 12 years ago

Also a good tutorial with examples: [Getting Started with Cyphertite Remote Backup](http://blog.calyptix.com/2012/04/getting-started-with-cypher...)

Cyphertite: 8 GB free encrypted backup with CLI client for Linux and Windows

Related Stories