JQTouch - jQuery plugin for mobile web development

http://www.jqtouch.com/

by laktek • 17 years ago

79 26 17 years ago

jqtouch.com

auston• 17 years ago

Very slick - Even on the iPhone (3g) which has been a problem with other frameworks.

eee7772• 17 years ago

Anyone know how this works for windows mobile devices?

davidkaneda7• 17 years ago

It doesn't, it's not meant to (I'm the creator, btw)-

eee7772• 17 years ago

I downloaded the Iris Browser which is based on webkit which was hard to find because Rim bought Torch Mobile and you can't download it from their site anymore. That may have been the last hope for a decent browser on Windows Mobile. Anyway, some of the features worked but it doesn't look as good as the video. Sometimes the back button didn't work and the About window wouldn't close. Mostly everything else worked but Page Flip. Keep up the good work.

chime• 17 years ago

Swipe detection works pretty well on iPhone. Good job. I couldn't do a swipe to turn on/off the toggle button. That would be a pretty sweet feature.

davidkaneda7• 17 years ago

Definitely will add. Feel free to post suggestions here: http://code.google.com/p/jqtouch/issues/list

mitjak• 17 years ago

Agreed. Also something isn't quite right with the toggle switch animation itself. Lack of easing perhaps? Hard to tell. Throw me off though. Otherwise looks and feels superb on 3GS and 3.0

endlessvoid94• 17 years ago

Tried this on my android and it was extremely laggy. The work looks good, but the performance was subpar.

I'll definitely keep checking up on this project, though. Looks very promising.

davidkaneda7• 17 years ago

I definitely need to test more on Android and Pre - hence the beta. With Android, I'm aiming primarily at "cupcake" release, as it's a newer version of WebKit. Hopefully, as they all get updated with newer and newer versions of WebKit, we'll see more ubiquity in general.

boucher• 17 years ago

Unfortunately, I think you'll find a lot of the newer WebKit features missing from the Pre. For example, the canvas implementation is stripped down and lacks, among other things, gradients.

callahad• 17 years ago

I'm running Cupcake here, and it's pretty painfully slow on my ADP1. Scrolling is a bit unreliable, as is trackball navigation. It looks great, though. Best of luck getting it working there.

akamaka2• 17 years ago

I tried in on my second gen iPod Touch, and although it doeen't lag, I got a lot of flicker, as well as UI elements getting stuck in the "on" position.

I like the idea, though, and would love to have a framework that just works on devices that I can't test on.

davidkaneda7• 17 years ago

Which firmware version is it on, just so I know — 2.2 or 3.0? Thanks-

Titanous• 17 years ago

Worked well on iPod Touch 2G 3.0

The external links got stuck in the on position, and the Todo demo flickered the row when checking/unchecking items.

dmose• 17 years ago

Hey NICE work!! I've been looking for something like this for a while... iUI is great, but fails horribly on certain clients.

karanbhangui• 17 years ago

I've been keeping an eye on this project. It's maturing nicely. However, for those doing exclusive iphone/webkit dev, check out: http://paularmstrongdesigns.com/projects/basejs/

It's much more lightweight and designed for said platform.

feverishaaron• 17 years ago

How does this look on the Pre?

davidkaneda7• 17 years ago

Not perfectly- See some of the notes above-

nfriedly• 17 years ago

That's funny, I was just going through old bookmarks the other day, and this is one of the ones I decided to keep.

BTW, welcome to news.yc davidkaneda. If you like, you can drop links to whatever projects you're working on in your profile: http://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=davidkaneda

snprbob86• 17 years ago

This looks like an excellent library, the demo works nicely on my iPhone, but...

I think that simulating native UI is a bad idea all around. If it looks like a native app, acts like a native app, I expect it to do everything like a native app. This gets 90% of the way there, but due to the nature of the browser will never be 100%. I think you are better off with a unique look and feel that won't confuse users. You'll also spend less time developing it, as you won't struggle to get every little detail to match.

cakesy• 17 years ago

There is actually loads of sites out there, that duplicate the iphone functionality, when in mobile mode. There are other toolkits to make your web more iphone-like. It has its advantages and disadvantages. Most people don't even know what the different is between a web app and an iphone app, so I think it is a reasonably safe bet.

njharman• 17 years ago

> Most people don't even know what the different is between a web app and an iphone app

Exactly! That is the problem. They don't know your web app is an iphone app. So, they get annoyed when it doesn't have all the functionality of an iphone app. They have higher bar of expectation that a webapp inherently can not reach.

If it was obviously a "web page" then user expectations are much lower and they are likely to be impressed by what it can do.

The key to success is not being good. It's being better than expected.

va_coder• 17 years ago

This looks awesome on the iphone

JQTouch - jQuery plugin for mobile web development

Related Stories