Why We Must Act

http://www.nytimes.com/1999/11/14/opinion/why-we-must-act.html?pagewanted=all

by conover • 13 years ago

27 12 13 years ago

nytimes.com

aqme28• 13 years ago

First off, [1999].

Second, Why was this submitted? Was it an attempt to draw comparisons with Putin's plea for us not to bomb Syria?

trekky17002• 13 years ago

I believe so, and it did so superbly.

jessaustin• 13 years ago

Are you saying the following?

Russia : Chechnya :: USA : Syria

Because that would indicate an impressive level of geographic, cultural, and political ignorance. Congratulations!

JTon• 13 years ago

Both thoughts came to my mind as well. As aside, I really enjoyed the article

ryanackley• 13 years ago

Chechnya is a republic of Russia. Seems legit for him to exercise some authority over it and try to keep peace there and in other parts of his own country.

I assume this has been posted to highlight some contradictory stance he is taking on Syria which is a sovereign country. Chechnya to Russia is not the the same as Syria to the USA.

trekky17002• 13 years ago

In 1999, Chechnya was its own republic. It was in 1999 that Russia launched a military campaign known as the Second Chechen War and took Chechnya back as a Russian state. Civillian casualty estimates during that war range from 25,000 to 50,000. It's all very complicated, of course.

EastLondonCoder• 13 years ago

Actually in 1999 Chechnya was an independent republic

davidw• 13 years ago

Political, mainstream news: this is pretty much by definition something that is supposed to be off topic here.

mpyne• 13 years ago

Let's let the upvotes decide, isn't that what we've been told about that Other Topic Which Shall Not Be Named? If enough people agree with you maybe this story will be flagged into oblivion.

But I think it's a very interesting riposte to Mr. Putin's essay in the NYT from this week.

temuze• 13 years ago

Then, in a flash, hundreds perish in explosions at the Watergate, or at an apartment complex on Manhattan's West Side. Thousands are injured, some horribly disfigured. Panic engulfs a neighborhood, then a nation.

It's remarkable that he is arguing for strong military action as a result of terrorist attacks using this hypothetical scenario, which is eerily similar to 9/11. In retrospect, he was right - we took strong military action as a result as well.

amirmansour• 13 years ago

Wait, if this was published in 1999, then how could he mention 9/11?

gringofyx• 13 years ago

He didn't mention 9/11 - he mentioned the WTC "bombing"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1993_World_Trade_Center_bombing

Why We Must Act

Related Stories