Faker.js - generate massive amounts of fake data in the browser and Node.js

https://github.com/marak/Faker.js/

by daGrevis • 13 years ago

107 22 13 years ago

github.com

DoubleCluster• 13 years ago

What's the use case for this? To annoy spammers?

checktiput• 13 years ago

Debug I suppose.

dugmartin• 13 years ago

I built something like this for an internal CMS framework and it really speed up prototyping pages - especially large list pages.

Swizec• 13 years ago

Coming up with random words and examples when writing tests is surprisingly tedious.

schumacher• 13 years ago

Cool. I recently build a similar thing for Magento to provide demo data and for anonymization purposes. Some parts of faker.js needs sure refactorings ...

agotterer• 13 years ago

I've been looking for something that can generate fake cart data. Is what you built open source?

revorad• 13 years ago

This is fantastic. I was actually looking for something like this to test some APIs with dummy data.

paavo2• 13 years ago

The original such library was Perl's Data::Faker which was ported to Ruby as Faker gem (and later refactored to faster and more comprehensive Ffaker gem).

qwerty692• 13 years ago

Very nice library. It would be nice to add the ability to generate random values based on a distribution, e.g. the values are random but correspond to a normal distribution with a given mean and standard deviation. This would be very useful for testing statistical libraries and applications.

SammoJ• 13 years ago

Which attributes would you sample from a normal distribution here? I don't see any numerical attributes where this would make sense. One could add weight, height, age etc. and sample from the relevant geographical/gender distributions?

qwerty692• 13 years ago

An example would be the processing of automatically acquired measurement data. Such data usually shows some kind of distribution (binominal, normal, geometric, etc...) that needs to be taken into account when validating such a tool.

DanBC• 13 years ago

This is cool.

I'm gently disturbed that it generates valid email addresses. You pick a random name, follow it with an @, then add a random word, and then add a TLD. Obviously you're not responsible for how people use the tool.

Best practice would be to use the domain example.com

paavo2• 13 years ago

In most use cases I can think of the generated data is used only in a closed (testing) environment and won't be visible to web crawlers and spambots. Many developers like me use these libraries for prototyping different UI views for their apps.

Unfortunately, spammers do have way more advanced technologies to try and guess working addresses. Libraries like this generate mostly very improbable addresses: you would get way better results just by taking lists of most popular first names and family names and concatenating them with some well-known web mail providers.

mindcrime2• 13 years ago

The bigger problem, in my experience, is when you accidentally spam people yourself, while testing some function that somehow generates an outgoing email. I think almost everybody that's ever worked on code that sends emails has - at one time or another - ran a job that somehow wound up sending 6,712,374 "test" messages to every user in the production database. :-) Dummy addresses are better, but it's better still if they use @example.com so you know there's no way they'll actually get delivered to anybody.

bpicolo• 13 years ago

If someone really wants to guess random addresses it isn't hard for them to write it themselves.

tonyblundell• 13 years ago

Great, thanks!

webfuel• 13 years ago

Thanks! I won't be using http://www.fakenamegenerator.com/ as much now.

fruchtose• 13 years ago

Great project! I would, however, recommend an API with more namespaces. Functions like Address.ukCounty don't sit well with me; such an API would be a mess if you added support for countries other than the US and the UK. You could (and probably create namespaces for each country code, e.g.:

    Address
    |-> US
        |-> state
    |-> UK
        |-> state

An alternative would be for country-specific generators to take a country code as an argument. I am not an experienced API designer, though, so take my comments with a heaping of salt.

justwrote• 13 years ago

Shameless plug: I also created a similar library for Scala some time ago https://github.com/justwrote/scala-faker

Need to update to 2.10 soon :)

robbyishere• 13 years ago

anjuna.js

hawkw• 13 years ago

So many Node.js libraries....

mindcrime2• 13 years ago

Obligatory "I wrote something similar" post. But my tool is written in Java, doesn't run in the browser, but does use @example.com for the email addresses.

https://github.com/mindcrime/dummydatagenerator

Faker.js - generate massive amounts of fake data in the browser and Node.js

Related Stories