You have zero privacy anyway. Get over it

https://www.techradar.com/pro/quote-of-the-day-by-sun-microsystems-ceo-scott-mcnealy-you-have-zero-privacy-anyway-get-over-it-an-early-declaration-foreshadowing-the-modern-era

by theanonymousone • 8 days ago

2 4 8 days ago

techradar.com

fsflover2• 8 days ago

A case against security nihilism (cryptographyengineering.com)

468 points by feross on July 20, 2021 | 333 comments

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27897975

sylware2• 8 days ago

The "less worse scenario of internet communication privacy" is direct IPv6(coze IPv4 with custom port redirections is messy, local custom IPv6 built on ISP provided prefix is much less messy) with custom UDP(or TCP, since its usage is broader than UDP then looks more "normal") ports, E2E encryption with non-public pre-shared keys. If you are competent enough, you would have custom modifications on some standard crypto (usually session pre-shared masks, which generation code is pre-shared) with a super simplified video/audio/text protocol (probably a super lean SIP or XMPP). Ofc, no clear protocol negotiations of any kind, the traffic is immediatly encrypted. If you really want to push it, your protocol should be isochronous and have fixed size data frames ("static", with probably an exception upon tranfering really big data files, unless you are really patient). Of course, everything coded in assembly on various ISAs, optional simple code generators coded in assembly themselves without abuse of any assembler pre-processor, which means the usage of some common binary specifications).

This should give you a rather "good" protection against mass-monitoring, and against John Doh, "hacker only on Sundays".

Yeah, and we did not talk about your "corpo" hardware, your system software built with silent backdoor inject... ahem... I meant "compilers".

And in the end with all that, if the 'services' or some experienced hacking team really want to watch _you_, don't worry, they will: they don't need your password or any of your crypto keys/data.

fsflover2• 8 days ago

Isn't what you described is basically I2P?

sylware2• 8 days ago

It is not, the 'static' part is just some sugar to remove a bit more information from the internet traffic generated by such communication protocol. The software development part is mostly to mitigate what's well know with current planned obsolescence abuse from many software actors (and move some risks from corpos to people).

I2P is obviously much less a fantasy than 'information system security' but is very creative and dependent on the current internet trends: you can encode in clear text in video games chat/socials, have fake streaming services (asymetric), fake video games, etc, etc. I heard 'rumors' a long time ago about about 'special commands' encoded in the silicon of some carrier grade routers, were they true?

I2P is a rabbit hole which can go, REALLY, REALLY DEEP. Basically, if the guys are carefull, the 'services' or experienced hacking team would need to know who to look at.

But here, nope, just something to help 'privacy', but as I said, with some limited impact on mass-monitoring and "John Doh" ("hacker only on Sundays").

You have zero privacy anyway. Get over it

Related Stories