Fable open sourced NanoClaw's agent factory. It cost $800

https://twitter.com/Gavriel_Cohen/status/2072432348805669139

by benocodes • 21 days ago

17 17 21 days ago

bearjaws2• 21 days ago

Since its behind an account wall, I can't tell if they are saying that Opus made the clone for cheaper or that Opus failed? It appears that Fable did far more "work" based on output tokens.

Aside: We should just ban Twitter links. Nobody should be required to make an account to view content on here.

rpdillon• 21 days ago

Yeah, I have to manually edit the URL to be xcancel instead every time. Maybe there's a grease monkey script around that handles this kind of thing. I can write one if not.

Edit: going to try this out https://greasyfork.org/en/scripts/531615-x-com-to-xcancel-co...

WithinReason2• 21 days ago

A general one that covers xcancel:

https://einaregilsson.com/redirector/

Use this:

Redirect: https://x.*

to: https://xcancel.$1

shaewest• 21 days ago

On the aside, where's the difference between someone posting a Twitter link and an Economist link? Both are locked behind a wall, whether it account-wall or pay-wall.

bearjaws2• 21 days ago

We can ban those too.

CamperBob2• 21 days ago

The Economist isn't owned by someone who cheats at video games, subverts the government, and thinks Nazi salutes are funny.

benj111• 21 days ago

Same with medium. Why?

WithinReason2• 21 days ago

xcancel supports articles now:

https://xcancel.com/i/article/2072432348805669139

Here is the result:

https://github.com/nanocoai/nanoclaw/pull/2742

escape_key• 21 days ago

xcancel link: https://xcancel.com/i/article/2072432348805669139

kylehotchkiss• 21 days ago

It's really unusual that developers would rather write behind a twitter authwalled link than to write to their own site and just tweet about it.

If you can spend $800 on Fable in a day, you can launch a fantastic looking/performing personal site in 15 minutes ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Perhaps Hacker News could ban this style of link to help encourage that?

supriyo-biswas• 21 days ago

But then you couldn’t engagement-farm like Twitter /s

hadlock• 21 days ago

I guess if you enjoy engaging with an echo chamber

sourcecodeplz2• 21 days ago

nowdays people get their reading on social media.

social media, also started heavily demoting posts with external links.

thus if you want reach, you need to post on platforms...

cadamsdotcom• 21 days ago

I’m confused. The post is a long description of merging one branch into another in a clean way, done by agents, at a scale never seen before. Bravo.

Does it do anything now that it didn’t before?

Who’s this for?

Why did it matter?

Is the world better now?

Unfortunately the post doesn’t discuss outcomes so I’m having a hard time seeing how the team’s $800 was best spent on this vs. some other priority.

jsnell• 21 days ago

This reads like AI-generated slop, flagging.

Fable open sourced NanoClaw's agent factory. It cost $800

Related Stories