AI bug reports went from junk to legit overnight, says Linux kernel czar

https://www.theregister.com/2026/03/26/greg_kroahhartman_ai_kernel/

by amarant • 4 months ago

61 5 4 months ago

dag100• 4 months ago

I think there was a major jump in AI capabilities from Anthropic and OpenAI between the end of 2025 and the start of 2026 that made them far more reliable at programming correctly. I wonder what changed in the secret sauce.

zar1048576• 4 months ago

I suspect the big jump came from the release of Claude Opus 4.5/4.6 and GPT-5.x-Codex between Nov ‘25 and Feb ‘26, which were trained with heavy reinforcement learning on long coding projects, rewarding only real success (like running code, using terminals, self-fixing bugs, and passing tests) while adding better memory for huge codebases and extra coding-specific training.

skeledrew• 4 months ago

Nothing drastic I'd say. It's a continuous stream of small improvements just accumulating with each release, and someone just noticed a few releases away from a previous publicized-bad-capabilities release that there's major improvement between those points. So it looks like something major only due to the spacing between the capability surveys on the release timeline.

halJordan• 4 months ago

It was drastic and immediate. It switched with the latest versions of opus and codex. It's why openclaw is popping off. The models became usable.

peterbell_nyc• 4 months ago

4.5 and 5.2. Transformative. I know dozens of CTOs who were piloting AI in the fall, took a day to do something real over Xmas and then came back to their orgs with a mandate to double down and experiment with software factories once they saw what the November drops enabled.

AI bug reports went from junk to legit overnight, says Linux kernel czar

Related Stories