Show HN: I cross-compiled llama.cpp to run on Windows XP

https://okt.ai/2025/11/30/running-llms-on-windows-xp-a-weekend-of-controlled-madness/

by dandinu • 8 months ago

2 9 8 months ago

Had a dumb thought: what if someone in 2003 could run a local LLM on their machine? XP desktop, rolling hills wallpaper, maybe Winamp in the corner—and you just chat with an AI locally.

I saw there were some attempts on Reddit, so I tried it myself.

Cross-compiled llama.cpp from macOS targeting Windows XP 64-bit. Main hurdles: downgrading cpp-httplib to v0.15.3 (newer versions explicitly block pre-Win8), replacing SRWLOCK/CONDITION_VARIABLE with XP-compatible threading primitives, and the usual DLL hell.

Qwen 2.5-0.5B runs at ~2-8 tokens/sec on period-appropriate hardware. Not fast, but it works.

Video demoand build instructions in the write-up.

Claude helped with most of the debugging on the build system. I just provided the questionable life choices.

vintagedave5• 8 months ago

Really shows what could be achieved back then -- and in a sense, how little the OS versions we have today add.

Challenge: could you build for 32-bit? From memory, few people used XP64, it was one of the Server editions, and Vista and Windows 7, when people started migrating.

dandinu4• 8 months ago

That's pretty accurate. I'm always amazed how much we move forward with technology, just to later realize we already had it 15 years ago.

regarding your question:

I have a 32bit XP version as well, and I actually started with that one.

The problem I was facing was that it's naturally limited to 4GB RAM, out of which only 3.1GB are usable (I wanted to run some beefier models and 64bit does not have the RAM limit).

Also, the 32bit OS kept freezing at random times, which was a very authentic Windows XP experience, now that I think about it. :)

vintagedave5• 8 months ago

out of which only 3.1GB are usable

That would be a real issue. I vaguely recall methods to work around this - various mappings, some Intel extension for high memory addressing, etc: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/memory/addre...

Maybe unrealistic :( I doubt this is drop-in code.

vintagedave5• 8 months ago

Eventually found it via a GitHub thread for LegacyUpdate.

Can you share that link in the blog? This is the equivalent of one of those forums posts, 'never mind, solved it.' It's helpful to share what you learned for those coming later :)

dandinu4• 8 months ago

there is a full technical write-up in the Github repo in "WINDOWS_XP.md": https://github.com/dandinu/llama.cpp/blob/master/WINDOWS_XP....

Sorry for failing to mention that.

Link to vcredist thread: https://github.com/LegacyUpdate/LegacyUpdate/issues/352

vintagedave5• 8 months ago

Cool, some person-and-or-AI in future may be able to find it now :D

vintagedave5• 8 months ago

XP-era hardware doesn’t have AVX. Probably doesn’t have AVX2 or FMA either. But SSE4.2 is safe for most 64-bit CPUs from 2008 onward:

It won't; FMA is available from AVX2-era onwards. If you target 32-bit, you'd only be "safe" with SSE2... if you really want a challenge, you'd use the Pentium Pro CPU feature set, ie the FPU.

I have to admit I'd be really curious what that looked like! You'd definitely want to use the fast math option.

This is an awesome effort, btw, and I enjoyed reading your blog immensely.

dandinu4• 8 months ago

Oh darn, you're absolutely right (pun intended) about the 32-bit situation. SSE2 is really the "floor" there if you want any kind of reasonable compatibility. I was being a bit optimistic with SSE4.2 even for 64-bit - technically safe for most chips from that era but definitely not all.

The Pentium Pro challenge though... pure x87 FPU inference? That would be gloriously cursed. You'd basically be doing matrix math like it's 1995. `-mfpmath=387` and pray.

I'm genuinely tempted to try this now. The build flags would be something like:

  -DGGML_AVX=OFF -DGGML_AVX2=OFF -DGGML_FMA=OFF \
  -DGGML_F16C=OFF -DGGML_SSE42=OFF -DGGML_SSSE3=OFF \
  -DGGML_SSE3=OFF -DGGML_SSE2=OFF  # pain begins here

And then adding `-ffast-math` to `CMAKE_C_FLAGS` because at that point, who cares about IEEE 754 compliance, we're running a transformer on hardware that predates Google.

If someone actually has a Pentium Pro lying around and wants to see Qwen-0.5B running on it... that would be the ultimate read for me as well.

Thanks for the kind words. Always fun to find fellow retro computing degenerates in the wild.

Show HN: I cross-compiled llama.cpp to run on Windows XP

Related Stories