Thoughts on Racket and Chez Scheme (2021)

https://beautifulracket.com/appendix/racket-and-chez-scheme.html

by swatson741 • 10 months ago

4 2 10 months ago

gus_massa• 10 months ago

To be fair, the Racket team has described its fork more as a “set of patches” that otherwise stays in sync with the main branch of Chez Scheme. Still, as time passes, the two will naturally tend to diverge further. Whether one calls it a “fork” or “set of patches”, the result is the same: some nonzero maintenance cost will persist, and likely grow.

Note that now Racket run on top of almost Chez Scheme. I think there are a few patches, but almost all the changes have been upstreamed.

samth• 10 months ago

The predictions from this post have almost entirely turned out to be wrong. Chez Scheme upstream decided to merge in Racket's changes entirely, and to make the lead developer of Racket (Matthew Flatt) a core Chez developer. These days Matthew is the most active Chez developer. Over the past few years, half of the serious Chez committers are people who come from Racket.

Thoughts on Racket and Chez Scheme (2021)

Related Stories