Resources for the Node.js Dev

http://java.dzone.com/articles/40-resources-nodejs-developer

by stagga_lee • 14 years ago

44 12 14 years ago

java.dzone.com

As someone just getting into Node.js development, I had been looking into a good (free, for now) PaaS for a hobby project. I had settled on Heroku, and I like it so far for its simplicity. However, reading this was the first time I had considered OpenShift for Node.js. Can anyone comment on the merits of OpenShift vs. Heroku? I've found surprisingly little information comparing the two while searching around.

From what I was seeing, OpenShift looked like it may offer more capacity with its free plan, but I may be missing something here...

ambirex• 14 years ago

AppFog just expanded their free tier to be able to use 2GB memory and 50GB of transfer.

creativename2• 14 years ago

Wow, looks very impressive. Thanks!

I may actually just start with that. From what I can tell, you get a much much larger database than Heroku, but with a lower bandwidth cap (although 50GB vs 2TB for my purposes is indistinguishable). AppFog also claims it has the "Fastest servers available on any infrastructure" (for what it's worth).

Unless I'm missing something, it sounds like a much better deal. Then again, I'm talking about two free services, but it would be nice to be able to avoid upgrading to paid for as long as possible.

taterbase• 14 years ago

Can't believe no one recommended http://nodejitsu.com. I use them exclusively right now.

There's also http://nodester.com but I've had to move away from them due to too many problems.

fpp2• 14 years ago

Have a look into NodeJitsu http://nodejitsu.com/

They recently opened up their services to the public and still have a free tier.

agilebyte2• 14 years ago

Not sure if that is a factor, but being in the UK I got way too many 404s in the free tier. In comparison (the same app), Heroku or OpenShift work like a charm.

agilebyte2• 14 years ago

Comparing the free Web Dyno on Heroku vs free Cartridge on OpenShift, the latter starts up faster for me. On the other hand, the client tools for OpenShift are of slightly lesser quality. And one more thing, with OpenShift you get Node.js 0.6 while with Heroku you can specify the engine version.

mrharrison• 14 years ago

Sounds like I still don't want to use node, no one has decided on what resources to use.

virmundi• 14 years ago

If that is your criteria for using a tool, you're never going to move into anything new. For web development many are happy with Express. Sure they tend to use Mongo or some no-sql type storage, but that is due to novelty and the fact that the individuals writing the async drivers are into that right now. MySQL has support and it's increasing.

Node's an interesting idea and should be given some room to grow. When done correctly it seems to scale well, especially on one box.

To go back to the topic, look at Java. There are so many tools out there to do the same thing in the MVC space. Would you say that you won't use Java because people can figure out which tools to use? To me the benefit of Node and Java is that you are not tied to a particular engineering group's view of the world. You can plug in what you want. You can experiment and learn yourself. A monolithic stack might be good from the it just work's perspective (though I've never seen that to be true and I've programmed in C#), but it does tie you to a release schedule of the vendor.

arunoda• 14 years ago

This post is too biased on OpenShift. OpenShift support for NodeJS is not the 2,3,4 things you anyone should look at.

I hope this should help some one to get started on Node quickly - https://github.com/joyent/node/wiki/Resources

And try to stay in control with NodeJS mailing list :)

fcambus• 14 years ago

I would like to mention NodeCloud as well, a Node.js resources directory ordering sites by their Alexa rank : http://www.nodecloud.org

Resources for the Node.js Dev

Related Stories