Furry engineer explains the nightmare that is the underlying complexity of USB-C

https://www.pcgamer.com/hardware/if-you-thought-usb-naming-was-nonsense-allow-this-professional-furry-engineer-explain-the-total-nightmare-that-is-the-underlying-hardware-complexity-of-usb-c/

by qdot76367 • 1 year ago

11 3 1 year ago

pcgamer.com

EvanAnderson2• 1 year ago

The part that really got me from this talk was the added expense and complexity associated with the orientation-independent connector. It's neat that it'll plug-in either way, but at a cost that seems unjustified. USB-A connectors are a pain to plug in, for sure, so there was arguably room for improvement. An asymmetric connector shell would have done the job fine at a much lower cost.

Also, all the power delivery negotiation details sound excruciating. It frustrates me how we make something elegant and simple then gunk it up w/ edge cases.

Our_Benefactors• 1 year ago

An asymmetric connector shell would have done the job fine at a much lower cost

It would have done a worse job by definition. Weird take. The lightning connector was a massive competitive advantage to Apple for years and the other side of the market needed an answer.

EvanAnderson2• 1 year ago

I don't have the problems with HDMI or micro-B USB, both of which have asymmetric connector shells, like I have with USB-A. The presentation talks a lot about the costs (complexity and money) associated with the orientation-indeoendent connector. It doesn't sound worth it to me when you're talking about the scale involved.

Furry engineer explains the nightmare that is the underlying complexity of USB-C

Related Stories