The Conversion of a Climate-Change Skeptic

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/30/opinion/the-conversion-of-a-climate-change-skeptic.html?pagewanted=all

by dandelany • 14 years ago

16 3 14 years ago

anthonyb• 14 years ago

I'm amazed that he even considers himself a skeptic. Everything in here has already been said by other scientists already, eg. his analysis apparently consists essentially of fitting temperature to CO2 levels:

  "Our result is based simply on the close agreement
   between the shape of the observed temperature rise
   and the known greenhouse gas increase. "

About the only reason that this is newsworthy is that he's a notable climate skeptic, and he's funding comes from Koch, a coal based lobbying organisation.

nl• 14 years ago

As expected, "skeptics" are now denying that Muller ever was a skeptic[1]. It is unfortunate - everyone should be skeptical, but when people start pulling out new, highly speculative theories (eg, the latest one - which I saw on HN - is that cosmic rays are responsible for climate change) to attempt to explain climate change it's hard not to think they are just denying for the sake of denying.

[1] http://www.climatedepot.com/a/13375/Befuddled-Warmist-Richar...

Vivtek• 14 years ago

The exciting thing about this for me is that they published their analysis code as well. [http://berkeleyearth.org/our-code/]

Now that's science!

The Conversion of a Climate-Change Skeptic

Related Stories