RWKV Language Model

https://www.rwkv.com/

by simonpure • 2 years ago

183 52 2 years ago

rwkv.com

nullc• 2 years ago

Anyone ever look at doing a MoE like composition with RWKV and a transformer?

pico_creator11• 2 years ago

Not an MoE, but we have already done hybrid models. And found it to be highly performant (as per the training budget)

https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.12077

intalentive3• 2 years ago

Idea for killer app for recurrent models: low latency, low memory LLM / TTS coupling. Start decoding / generating speech as soon as new tokens are generated. When the LLM is cranking out token t, the TTS is already working on token t-1. It doesn’t have to wait. Then when the LLM is finished, the TTS is nearly finished too. The two models being colocated you just saved another network call as well.

Recurrent models with constant hidden state are naturally suited to streaming data, potentially opening the door to unexplored new use cases.

computerex• 2 years ago

New multimodal models take raw speech input and provide raw speech output, no tts in the middle.

benob• 2 years ago

A relatively detailed description of such systems: https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.00037

Closi• 2 years ago

Seems like the future - so much meaning and context is lost otherwise.

intalentive3• 2 years ago

Very cool. Logical next step. Would be interested to know what the dataset looks like.

cootsnuck• 2 years ago

This can currently already be done using a streaming capable LLM with a streaming input/output TTS model.

lostmsu2• 2 years ago

Any LLM is "streaming capable".

pico_creator11• 2 years ago

This is actually the hypothesis for cartesia (state space team), and hence their deep focus on voice model specifically. Taking full advantage of recurrent models constant time compute, for low latencies.

RWKV team's focus is still however is first in the multi-lingual text space, then multi-modal space in the future.

swyx4• 2 years ago

Karan from Cartesia explains SSMs+voice really well: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U9DPRZ0lSIQ

its one of those retrospectively obvious/genius insights that i wish i understood when i first met him

yshui• 2 years ago

Any autoregressive model can do what you are describing. transformers are generating one token at a time too, not all at once.

whimsicalism• 2 years ago

yes but transformers are much slower than state space models

intalentive3• 2 years ago

True but memory requirements grow with sequence length. For recurrent models the memory requirement is constant. This is why I qualified with "low memory".

sushidev• 2 years ago

Interesting. Very cryptic for simple user like me. I wonder if it’s useful today and for what purposes

pico_creator11• 2 years ago

Currently the strongest RWKV model is 32B in size: https://substack.recursal.ai/p/q-rwkv-6-32b-instruct-preview

This is a full drop in replacement for any transformer model use cases on model sizes 32B and under, as it has equal performance to existing open 32B models in most benchmarks

We are in works on a 70B, which will be a full drop in replacement for most text use cases

swyx4• 2 years ago

how about finetuning your 32B to be R1QWQKV?

lostmsu2• 2 years ago

Why aren't you on lmarena (former chatbot arena) leaderboard?

swyx4• 2 years ago

for those who want a more conversational intro, we've been covering RWKV for a bit!

2023: https://latent.space/p/rwkv

2024: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LPe6iC73lrc <- offers a bit of professional compare and contrast vs state space models.

i think its cool that now both RNN and LSTM (with xLSTM) now have modern attention-inspired variants that solve the previous issues. I wonder if 1) its possible to overcome the "hardware lottery" that transformers have now won, and 2) if recurrent/selective state can do the kind of proper lookback on extremely long context that we will want it to do to compete with full attention (easy to say no, harder to propose what to do about it).

there's also Liquid AI, whatever it is that they do.

inciampati• 2 years ago

the recurrent model needs a mechanism to replay past context. no need to go quadratic to access all of it. they could replay multiple times to get effects similar to attention.

the hardware lottery, well... imo it's really about leveraging fully parallel training to learn how to use a memory. attention is quadratic but it can be computed in parallel. it's an end to end learned memory. getting that kind of pattern into RNNs won't be easy but it's going to be crucial before we boil the ocean.

pico_creator11• 2 years ago

RWKV already solve the parallel compute problem for GPU, based on the changes it has done - so it is a recurrent model that can scale to thousands++ of GPU no issue.

Arguably with other recurrent architecture (State Space, etc) with very different design implementation. The issue of old recurrent design was just the way LSTM was designed. Not the recurrent nature.

shawntan2• 2 years ago

Although marketed as such, RWKV isn't really an RNN.

In the recent RWKV7 incarnation, you could argue it's a type of Linear RNN, but past versions had an issue of taking its previous state from a lower layer, allowing for parallelism, but makes it closer to a convolution than a recurrent computation.

As for 1), I'd like to believe so, but it's hard to get people away from the addictive drug that is the easily parallelised transformer, 2) (actual) RNNs and attention mechanisms to me seem fairly powerful (expressivity wise) and perhaps most acceptable by the community.

bravura• 2 years ago

Recent work by Feng et al from Bengio's lab focus on how attention can be formulated as an RNN ("Attention as RNN": https://arxiv.org/pdf/2405.13956) and how minimal versions of GRUs and LSTMs can be trained in parallel by removing some parameters ("Were RNNs All We Needed?" https://arxiv.org/pdf/2410.01201).

It's possible we start seeing more blended version of RNN/attention architecture exploring different LLM properties.

In particular, Aaren architecture in the former paper "can not only (i) be trained in parallel (like Transformers) but also (ii) be updated efficiently with new tokens, requiring only constant memory for inferences (like traditional RNNs)."

HarHarVeryFunny• 2 years ago

The Transformer was specifically conceived to take advantage of pre-existing massively parallel hardware, so it's a bit backwards to say it "won the hardware lottery". Where the Transformer did "win the lottery" is that the key-value form of self-attention (invented by Noam Shazeer) needed to make parallel processing work seems to have accidentally unlocked capabilities like "induction heads" that make this type of architecture extremely well suited to language prediction.

Given limits on clock speed, massive parallelism is always going to be the way to approach brain-like levels of parallel computation, so any model architecture aspiring to human level AGI needs to be able to take advantage of that.

swyx4• 2 years ago

you are correct of course but i meant hardware lottery in the sense of dedicated silicon companies like Etched and MatX that have now emerged to make chips that only run transformers (not exactly true for matx but hey i am simplifying. would be cool if matx ran other arch's but its not a priority)

pico_creator11• 2 years ago

Hey there, im Eugene / PicoCreator - co-leading the RWKV project - feel free to AMA =)

low_tech_punk• 2 years ago

Thanks! The 0.1B version looks perfect for embedded system. What is the key benefit of attention-free architecture?

pico_creator11• 2 years ago

lower compute cost especially over longer sequence length. Depending on context length, its 10x, 100x, or even 1000x+ cheaper. (quadratic vs linear cost difference)

Ey7NFZ3P0nzAe3• 2 years ago

Has there been progress towards making RWKV multimodal? Can be use projector layers to send images to RWKV?

pico_creator11• 2 years ago

There is work done for Vision RWKV, and audio RWKV, an example paper is here: https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.02308

Its the same principle as open transformer models where an adapter is used to generate the embedding

However currently the core team focus is in scaling the core text model, as this would be the key performance driver, before adapting multi-modal.

The tech is there, the base model needs to be better

Ey7NFZ3P0nzAe3• 2 years ago

I'm quite interested in repeng [0] (representztion engineering) for steerability of (so fzr transformer based) LLMs and was wondering if anyone had tried such methods on rwkv (or mamba for that matter). Maybe there are some low hanging fruits about it.

[0] https://github.com/vgel/repeng/issues

pico_creator11• 2 years ago

One of the interesting "new direction" for RWKV and Mamba (or any recurrent model), is the monitoring and manipulation of the state in between token. For steerability, alignment, etc =)

Not saying its a good or bad idea, but pointing out that having a fixed state in between has interesting applications in this space

theLiminator• 2 years ago

Do you have an in depth comparison between RWKV and models like mamba or s4?

pico_creator11• 2 years ago

Not sure how indepth you want it to be. But we did do a co-presentation with one of the coauthors of mamba at latent space : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LPe6iC73lrc

jharohit• 2 years ago

congrats and great work on RWKV and Recursal.ai

Ey7NFZ3P0nzAe3• 2 years ago

I noticed the lack of support from ollama and llama.cpp for RWKV. As those are (to my eyes) very strong drivers of experimentation (i.e. supporting them means vastly more outreach) I was considering whether you were considering taking this into your own hands by contributing code to them? Or rather is the fact that you are not (AFAIK) doing it because you lack the bandwidth in terms of man power or any other reason?

littlestymaar• 2 years ago

Has there been any plans to build a “reasoning” llm using RWKV? With the increase in inference token count caused by such methods, the muhc lower footprint of recurrent architecture could really make a difference for such a use-case.

bratao• 2 years ago

What would be the most performant way to run a inference using RWKV? Do you have and speed comparison to a similar sized transformer?

I have a task(OCR cleaning) that I´m evaluating faster options and look like RWKV would be a nice alternative.

nickpsecurity2• 2 years ago

It’s really, interesting work. I’m glad you’ve kept at it. I’d like to ask you about two issues.

I keep seeing papers like “Repeat After Me” claiming serious weaknesses of state space vs transformer models. What are the current weaknesses of RWKV vs transformers? Have you mitigated them? If so, how?

The other issue is that file sharing being illegal, Wikipedia requiring derivatives to be copyleft, etc means I can’t train models with most data legally. Pre-1920’s works in Project Gutenberg are totally public domain. Both the model and the training data would be 100% legal for reproducible research. Would your team be willing to train a 3B-7B model on only Gutenberg and release it to the public domain?

(Note: The Stack without GitHub Issues can be used for permissive code. However, there could be contamination issues like incorrect licenses, PII, etc. So, maybe at least one, 100% legal model. Maybe a second with Gutenberg and The Stack for coding research.)

Example use of Gutenberg:

https://www.tensorflow.org/datasets/catalog/pg19

anon373839• 2 years ago

The other issue is that file sharing being illegal, Wikipedia requiring derivatives to be copyleft, etc means I can’t train models with most data legally.

That really depends on whether LLM pretraining ends up held as an infringing use. (Of course, it’ll take a while for the cases to work through the courts and for a body of jurisprudence to be developed on this subject.)

smusamashah• 2 years ago

How does it compare with other LLMs in terms of performance? Is.it near GPT 3 or Llama or what?

upghost• 2 years ago

Seems really cool. Does anyone have any sample code to link to? Do RNN models use the same pytorch/hugging face Python stuff or is it completely different...?

ianand• 2 years ago

Reminder that Microsoft ships RWKV with Windows (~1.5 billion devices), making it probably the most widely deployed non transformer model out there. Amazing work! https://blog.rwkv.com/p/rwkvcpp-shipping-to-half-a-billion

ps Eugene you should brag about that on the homepage of RWKV.

Fischgericht• 2 years ago

"RWKV (pronounced RwaKuv)" - love it. How does the corw make? Rwa! Rwa! Rwa!

bbor• 2 years ago

Thank god I’m not the only one stunned by that. I don’t need IPA, but this isn’t even vaguely pronounceable!

bigattichouse• 2 years ago

I've spent an afternoon attempting to compile and run RWKV7 locally.. and I just don't get it. lotta errors in compiling... and it's a lot. Like a lot, a lot... it's walls of versions and sub projects.

Any kind of quickstart guide?

Also found.tried rwkv.cpp, and I can't seem to compile that either.

RWKV Language Model

Related Stories