Support for Claude Sonnet 3.5, OpenAI O1 and Gemini 1.5 Pro

https://www.qodo.ai/blog/announcing-support-for-claude-sonnet-3-5-openai-o1-and-gemini-1-5-pro/

by benocodes • 2 years ago

69 35 2 years ago

senko• 2 years ago

Apparently that's Codium, who have recently renamed themselves to Qodo: https://www.qodo.ai/blog/introducing-qodo-a-new-name-the-sam... (TIL)

SquareWheel2• 2 years ago

It seems like their new name is literally "Qodo (formerly Codium)", parenthetical included. At first I thought they were just including it in the blog post for clarity, but they literally write it out that way a dozen times. It's also included as part of their new logo and in the site title.

I've never seen anything like that before. It feels like a search+replace operation gone awry.

superfrank2• 2 years ago

SEO reasons maybe?

emmanueloga_2• 2 years ago

Why is "Qodo" "better" than "Codium"?

tourmalinetaco• 2 years ago

Maybe it’s a joke? Like “X, formerly Twitter” or “Ye, formerly Kanye”, or even “the artist formerly known as Prince”.

gronky_• 2 years ago

I tried generating the same test with all 5 models in Qodo Gen.

o1 is very slow - like, you can go get a coffee while it generates a single test (if it doesn’t time out in middle).

o1-mini thought worked really well. It generated a good test and wasn’t noticeably slower than the other models.

My feeling is that o1-mini will end up being more useful for coding than o1, except for maybe some specific instances where you need very deep analysis

superfrank2• 2 years ago

How well did it work for generating tests? I was looking for an AI test generation tool yesterday and I came across this and it wasn't clear how good it is.

(before I get a bunch of comments about not letting AI write tests, this is for a hobby side project that I have a few hours a week to work on. I'm looking into AI test generation because the alternative is no tests)

gaze• 2 years ago

I guess this is as good a place as any to ask -- what's everyone's favorite AI code assist tool?

mattnewton2• 2 years ago

cursor. First one I've tried that seems like it's more than a neat demo.

- but I'm weird and I usually disable tab completion, I find having generations popping up while I'm typing slows me down, I gotta read them and think about it, feels like it's giving me ADD. So I've always kinda been a copilot hater. Lots of people find this more productive, and a fancy version of it is on by default in Cursor. However, Cursor implemented a bunch of different interfaces well not just the copilot one, and I find the chat window in your editor for churning out boilerplate or refactors is a huge productivity win personally. There are a lot of one-off refactors that are annoying enough that I wouldn't want to dedicate an afternoon to them but now they are taking me just a few minutes of reviewing AI changes.

written-beyond• 2 years ago

Exactly why I never went with getting copilot, I instead got a chatgpt subscription and prompt for stuff I need.

I do sort of regret it too, sometimes you just want to give more context and it's a hassle at that time. Figuring out what is it you need to paste to ensure the model has adequate context to generate something valid. Also, Claude is magnitudes superior to ChatGPT anything. Both are terrible at implementing abstract completely unique code blocks, however ChatGPT is significantly more "markov-y" when it comes to generating any code. When Claude gets things wrong it feels like a more human mistake.

Anyway, with 50% of HN obsessing over Cursor, is it worth it? I couldn't get it to open projects I have in WSL2 and I kind of gave up at that point. I've gotten far with Claude's free tier and $20 for just cursor seems steep for something that's not as stable.

Have you assessed Zed auto completion or read about others experience of it? Zed seems like something with a more stable foundation than any of these VSCode forks.

Alifatisk• 2 years ago

Cursor.

jonathaneunice• 2 years ago

Cursor.

All in on tab completion and its other UI/UX advances (generate, chat, composer, ...)

nicce• 2 years ago

Zed's integrated tools have been more than enough for me.

aberoham• 2 years ago

aider-chat

victorbjorklund• 2 years ago

Aider AI.

emmanueloga_2• 2 years ago

Recent: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41819039

ghawkescs• 2 years ago

Same question, but for VSCode plugins. Besides copilot what is everyone using? Claude support is a huge plus.

Y_Y• 2 years ago

Emacs.

sunaookami• 2 years ago

Cody

edm0nd• 2 years ago

I've been loving Claude Sonnet for python

_lvbh• 2 years ago

I don't use AI much but I do have CopilotChat.nvim for when I do need it. o1 and Claude support was just added yesterday. (Disclaimer: I am one of the maintainers)

d4rkp4ttern• 2 years ago

Zed - open source, written in rust and hence extremely fast. I’ve always been a jetbrains user and every time I tried VSCode it never stuck. For such people zed is great since you can set up the config to use jetbrains key maps. Also you can get it to work with open LLMs via ollama or groq or cerebras; the latter two require an unpublished hack; here’s my config, thank me later :)

https://gist.github.com/pchalasani/9e71c58d2f846412b253ae0ec...

haliliceylan• 2 years ago

How is that free ???

rtsil• 2 years ago

Presumably free refers to the users on their free plan, which does not include code generation/autocomplete except for tests.

decide1000• 2 years ago

I use Tabnine. It supports many models, including Claude. I find the output better compared to CoPilot. My IDE's are from Jetbrains and I work in Python and PHP mainly.

greenavocado• 2 years ago

I want to bring my own API keys not pay $20 a month for another sub

Support for Claude Sonnet 3.5, OpenAI O1 and Gemini 1.5 Pro

Related Stories